Retrospective study of cytologic features of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in dogs.

BACKGROUND Cytologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is possible when hepatocytes have prominent criteria of malignancy, but is problematic when hepatocytes have a relatively normal morphologic appearance. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the cytologic features of histologically confirmed well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (WD-HCC) in dogs to develop reasonable criteria for an accurate diagnosis when obvious criteria of malignancy in hepatocytes are lacking. METHODS Slides of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates of 15 histologically confirmed WD-HCC in dogs were evaluated retrospectively using a scoring system (0-3) established for 33 cytologic features. For comparison, 15 cytologic samples of non-nodular non-neoplastic liver were evaluated using the same criteria. Statistical analysis included multiple hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method or false discovery rate control to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULTS The most significant and useful cytologic features in the diagnosis of canine WD-HCC were dissociation of hepatocytes, acinar or palisading arrangements of neoplastic cells, and the presence of naked nuclei and capillaries, together with mild anisocytosis, anisokaryosis, multinuclearity, and increased N:C ratios. CONCLUSIONS Cytologic features of canine WD-HCC were determined. Further studies are warranted to compare these cytologic criteria among WD-HCC, hepatomas, and hyperplastic nodules and to examine co-variance of the 33 cytologic features.

[1]  C. Masserdotti Unusual "erythroid loops" in canine blood smears after viper-bite envenomation. , 2009, Veterinary clinical pathology.

[2]  J. Cullen,et al.  Tumors of the Liver and Gall Bladder , 2008 .

[3]  C. Masserdotti Architectural patterns in cytology: correlation with histology. , 2006, Veterinary clinical pathology.

[4]  J. Cullen,et al.  Chapter 9 – Morphological classification of neoplastic disorders of the canine and feline liver , 2006 .

[5]  P. Xie,et al.  Significance and relationship between infiltrating inflammatory cell and tumor angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues. , 2005, World journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  M. Torbenson,et al.  Cytopathologic grading of hepatocellular carcinoma on fine‐needle aspiration , 2004, Cancer.

[7]  L. Tao,et al.  Cytologic features and histologic correlations of microacinar and microtrabecular types of well‐differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in fine‐needle aspiration biopsy , 2003, Cancer.

[8]  P. Hermonat,et al.  Mast cells and human hepatocellular carcinoma. , 2003, World journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  Aileen Wee,et al.  Highly Well Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Benign Hepatocellular Lesions , 2003, Acta Cytologica.

[10]  T. V. D. van den Ingh,et al.  The Influence of Age on the Cytology of the Liver in Healthy Dogs , 2002, Veterinary pathology.

[11]  L. Roth Comparison of liver cytology and biopsy diagnoses in dogs and cats: 56 cases. , 2001, Veterinary clinical pathology.

[12]  K. Ishak,et al.  Tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts , 2001 .

[13]  K. Ishak,et al.  Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Liver: A Comparative Immunohistochemical Study with Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[14]  E. Longchampt,et al.  Accuracy of Cytology vs. Microbiopsy for the Diagnosis of Well-Differentiated Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Macroregenerative Nodule , 2000, Acta Cytologica.

[15]  G. Sterrett,et al.  Cytodiagnosis of well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[16]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[17]  A. Wee,et al.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagnostic dilemma at the ends of the spectrum. , 1994, Acta cytologica.

[18]  M. Cohen,et al.  Cytologic criteria to distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma from nonneoplastic liver. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  Y. Bédard,et al.  Cytologic, ultrastructural and immunologic features of intracytoplasmic hyaline bodies in fine needle aspirates of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1990, Acta cytologica.

[20]  X. Yue,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis by transthoracic fine needle sampling without aspiration. , 1989, Acta cytologica.

[21]  P. Becker,et al.  Fine needle cytology--is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. , 1989, Acta cytologica.

[22]  L. Zoebeli,et al.  Fine needle aspiration of the liver. Significance of hepatocytic naked nuclei in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1988, Acta cytologica.

[23]  Berman Jj,et al.  Cirrhosis with atypia. A potential pitfall in the interpretation of liver aspirates. , 1988 .

[24]  M. Tatsuta,et al.  Cell features and patterns in fine‐needle aspirates of hepatocellular carcinoma , 1986, Cancer.

[25]  Y. Nakanuma,et al.  Expression of mallory bodies in hepatocellular carcinoma in man and its significance , 1986, Cancer.

[26]  W. R. Kelly CHAPTER 2 – The Liver and Biliary System , 1985 .

[27]  A. Hurvitz,et al.  Canine Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 1981, Veterinary pathology.

[28]  K. Ishak,et al.  Ground-glass cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1980, American journal of clinical pathology.

[29]  H. Conn,et al.  Comparison of the Histologic and Cytologic Diagnosis of Liver Biopsies in Hepatic Cancer , 1979 .

[30]  A. W. Jones,et al.  Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency and hepatocellular carcinoma. , 1979, Journal of clinical pathology.

[31]  Strombeck Dr Clinicopathologic features of primary and metastatic neoplastic disease of the liver in dogs. , 1978 .