Optimization of Mobile IPv6-Based Handovers to Support VoIP Services in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks

The support of voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services in next-generation wireless systems requires the coupling of mobility with quality of service. The mobile node can experience disruptions or even intermittent disconnections of an ongoing real-time session due to handovers. The duration of such interruptions is called disruption time or handover delay and can heavily affect user satisfaction. Therefore, this delay needs to be minimized to provide good-quality VoIP services. In this paper, the focus is on the network layer mobility, specifically on mobile Internet Protocols (MIPs), since they are natural candidates for providing mobility at layer 3. Using analytical models, the authors evaluate MIPv4, MIPv6, fast MIPv6 (FMIPv6), and hierarchical MIPv6 (HMIPv6) and compare their performances in terms of handover delay for VoIP services. To optimize the handover delay, the authors propose to use the adaptive retransmission timer described in this paper. The results obtained using the adaptive timer technique show that for a 3% frame error rate and a 128-kb/s channel, the handoff delay is about 0.075 s (predictive) and 0.051 s (reactive) for FMIPv6. It is around 0.047 s [intra-mobile anchor point (MAP)] and 1.47 s (inter-MAP) for HMIPv6, around 1 s for MIPv6, and 0.26 s for MIPv4

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Route Optimization for Mobile IP , 1998, Cluster Computing.

[2]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6) , 2005, RFC.

[3]  Xavier Pérez Costa,et al.  A performance study of hierarchical mobile IPv6 from a system perspective , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[4]  Mosa Ali Abu-Rgheff,et al.  Design and evaluation of an integrated mobile IP and SIP framework for advanced handoff management , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[5]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Hand-off delay analysis in SIP-based mobility management in wireless networks , 2003, Proceedings International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[6]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A performance comparison of Mobile IPv6, Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, fast handovers for Mobile IPv6 and their combination , 2003, MOCO.

[7]  Chieh-Yih Wan,et al.  Comparison of IP micromobility protocols , 2002, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[8]  Jin-Woo Jung,et al.  Performance evaluation of two layered mobility management using mobile IP and session initiation protocol , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[9]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Mobility management for VoIP service: Mobile IP vs. SIP , 2002, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[10]  James Kempf,et al.  Scalability and robustness analysis of mobile IPv6, fast mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, and hybrid IPv6 mobility protocols using a large-scale simulation , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[11]  Wei Wu,et al.  Network assisted IP mobility support in wireless LANs , 2003, Second IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications, 2003. NCA 2003..

[12]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[13]  Rajeev Koodli,et al.  Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6 , 2001, RFC.