BACKGROUND
Reality Orientation (RO) was first described as a technique to improve the quality of life of confused elderly people, although its origins lie in an attempt to rehabilitate severely disturbed war veterans, not in geriatric work. It operates through the presentation of orientation information (eg time, place and person-related) which is thought to provide the person with a greater understanding of their surroundings, possibly resulting in an improved sense of control and self-esteem. There has been criticism of RO in clinical practice, with some fear that it has been applied in a mechanical fashion and has been insensitive to the needs of the individual. There is also a suggestion that constant relearning of material can actually contribute to mood and self-esteem problems. There is often little consistent application of psychological therapies in dementia services, so a systematic review of the available evidence is important in order to identify the effectiveness of the different therapies. Subsequently, guidelines for their use can be made on a sound evidence base.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the evidence of effectiveness for the use of Reality Orientation (RO) as a classroom-based therapy on elderly persons with dementia.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Computerised databases were searched independently by 2 reviewers entering the terms 'Reality Orientation, dementia, control, trial or study'. Relevant web sites were searched and some hand searching was conducted by the reviewer. Specialists in the field were approached for undocumented material, and all publications found were searched for additional references.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and all controlled trials with some degree of concealment, blinding or control for bias (second order evidence) of Reality Orientation as an intervention for dementia were included. The criteria for inclusion/exclusion involved systematic assessment of the quality of study design and the risk of bias, using a standard data extraction form. A measure of cognitive and/or behavioural change was needed.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were extracted independently by both reviewers, using a previously tested data extraction form. Authors were contacted for data not provided in the papers. Psychological scales measuring cognitive and behavioural changes were examined.
MAIN RESULTS
6 RCTs were entered in the analysis, with a total of 125 subjects (67 in experimental groups, 58 in control groups). Results were divided into 2 subsections: cognition and behaviour. Change in cognitive and behavioural outcomes showed a significant effect in favour of treatment.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
There is some evidence that RO has benefits on both cognition and behaviour for dementia sufferers. Further research could examine which features of RO are particularly effective. It is unclear how far the benefits of RO extend after the end of treatment, but and it appears that a continued programme may be needed to sustain potential benefits.
[1]
E. Helmes,et al.
Standardization and validation of the Multidimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES).
,
1987,
Journal of gerontology.
[2]
The kingston dementia rating scale
,
1991
.
[3]
J. Morris,et al.
The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assesment of Alzheimer's disease
,
1989,
Neurology.
[4]
Hodkinson Hm.
Mental impairment in the elderly.
,
1973
.
[5]
M. Mort,et al.
Experimental Treatment of Persistent Senile Confusion
,
1958
.
[6]
S. McLaren,et al.
The comparative effectiveness of three versions of 'classroom' reality orientation.
,
1981,
Age and ageing.
[7]
S. Turner,et al.
An evaluation of reality orientation therapy
,
1982
.
[8]
C. Salter,et al.
Effects of an individualized activity program on elderly patients.
,
1975,
The Gerontologist.
[9]
M. Motta,et al.
Effects of reality orientation therapy on elderly patients in the community.
,
1993,
Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.
[10]
D. Dixon,et al.
Reality orientation. A milieu therapy used in an institution for the aged.
,
1977,
The Gerontologist.
[11]
E. Miller,et al.
Reality Orientation: A Critical Appraisal
,
1982,
British Journal of Psychiatry.
[12]
G. Wallis,et al.
Reality orientation therapy--a controlled trial.
,
1983,
The British journal of medical psychology.
[13]
H. Zepelin,et al.
Evaluation of a yearlong reality orientation program.
,
1981,
Journal of gerontology.
[14]
G. Frisoni,et al.
Reality Orientation Therapy in Alzheimer Disease: Useful or Not? A Controlled Study
,
1995,
Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.
[15]
Woods Rt.
Reality orientation and staff attention: a controlled study.
,
1979
.
[16]
S Baines,et al.
Reality Orientation and Reminiscence Therapy
,
1987,
British Journal of Psychiatry.
[17]
C. S. Harris,et al.
An outcome evaluation of reality orientation therapy with geriatric patients in a state mental hospital.
,
1976,
The Gerontologist.
[18]
C. Cornbleth,et al.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Reality Orientation Classes in a Nursing Home Unit
,
1979,
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
[19]
F. Boller,et al.
Cognitive stimulation of patients with dementia: Preliminary results
,
1994
.
[20]
R. Mcguire,et al.
Reality Orientation and Dementia: A Controlled Trial of Two Approaches
,
1981,
British Journal of Psychiatry.
[21]
D. Ivison,et al.
Use of environmental manipulation and modified informal reality orientation with institutionalized, confused elderly subjects: a replication.
,
1987,
Age and ageing.
[22]
M. Hogstel.
Use of Reality Orientation with Aging Confused Patients
,
1979,
Nursing research.
[23]
D. Ivison,et al.
Use of environmental manipulation and classroom and modified informal reality orientation with institutionalized, confused elderly patients.
,
1985,
Age and ageing.