Why and how innovations get adopted: a tale of four models

Scholars studying innovation have proposed several different models of the adoption process. This essay identifies two broad dimensions which differentiate the principal models: the strength of the evidence regarding an innovation's efficacy and the extent of increasing returns. In this essay, we propose that differences across these dimensions map to four models of the adoption/diffusion process prominent in the literature. We then analyze the diffusion patterns of six well-studied innovations in terms these variables, and discuss which models seems to fit them best. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

[1]  J. Peto,et al.  High constant incidence in twins and other relatives of women with breast cancer , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[2]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[3]  Giorgio Fagiolo.  A Note on Equilibrium Selection in Polya-Urn Coordination Games , 2005 .

[4]  S. Blume,et al.  A Brief History of Polio Vaccines , 2000, Science.

[5]  T. Kretschmer,et al.  Catching a Wave: The Adoption of Voice and High-Commitment Workplace Practices in Britain, 1984-1998 , 2005 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[7]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[8]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[9]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[11]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[12]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The Political Economy of Hybrid Corn , 1986 .

[13]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  B. Lerner.  "To see today with the eyes of tomorrow": A history of screening mammography. , 2003, Canadian bulletin of medical history = Bulletin canadien d'histoire de la medecine.

[15]  P. David.  Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions , 1994 .

[16]  E. Mansfield.  TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE RATE OF IMITATION , 1961 .

[17]  B. Ryan.  The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .

[18]  Jack Kloppenburg,et al.  First the seed : the political economy of plant biotechnology, 1492-2000 , 1988 .

[19]  Robert F. Freeland,et al.  The Myth of the M-Form? Governance, Consent, and Organizational Change , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Walter G. Vincenti,et al.  The Retractable Airplane Landing Gear and the Northrop “Anomaly”: Variation-Selection and the Shaping of Technology , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[21]  B. Lerner.  Fighting the War on Breast Cancer: Debates over Early Detection, 1945 to the Present , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  C. Hill,et al.  Oliver Williamson and the M-Form Firm: A Critical Review , 1985 .

[23]  J C Bailar,et al.  Mammography: a contrary view. , 1976, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[25]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[26]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The adoption of the M-form organizational structure: a test of imitation hypothesis , 1988 .

[27]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[28]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.