Fatigue damage study of helical wires in catenary unbonded flexible riser near touchdown point

This study presents an analytical model of flexible riser and implements it into finiteelement software ABAQUS to investigate the fatigue damage of helical wires near touchdown point (TDP). In the analytical model, the interlayer contact pressure is simulated by setting up springs between adjacent interlayers. The spring stiffness is iteratively updated based on the interlayer penetration and separation conditions in the axisymmetric analysis. During the bending behavior, the axial stress of helical wire along the circumferential direction is traced to determine whether the axial force overcomes the interlayer friction force and thus lead to sliding. Based on the experimental data in the literature, the model is verified. The present study implements this model into ABAQUS to carry out the global analysis of the catenary flexible riser. In the global analysis, the riser–seabed interaction is simulated by using a hysteretic seabed model in the literature. The effect of the seabed stiffness and interlayer friction on the fatigue damage of helical wire near touchdown point is parametrically studied, and the results indicate that these two aspects significantly affect the helical wire fatigue damage, and the sliding of helical wires should be taken into account in the global analysis for accurate prediction of fatigue damage. Meanwhile, different from the steel catenary riser, high seabed stiffness may not correspond to high fatigue damage of helical wires. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4036675]

[1]  Feargal Brennan,et al.  Fatigue design of offshore steel mono-pile wind substructures , 2014 .

[2]  J.M.M. Out,et al.  Slippage of helical reinforcing on a bent cylinder , 1997 .

[3]  J.-M. Leroy,et al.  Calculation of Stresses and Slips in Helical Layers of Dynamically Bent Flexible Pipes , 2001 .

[4]  Charles Aubeny,et al.  Seafloor-Riser Interaction Model , 2009 .

[5]  Hongxiang Xue,et al.  Fatigue analysis of steel catenary riser at the touch-down point based on linear hysteretic riser-soil interaction model , 2013 .

[6]  Shixiao Fu,et al.  Theoretical and numerical analysis of bending behavior of unbonded flexible risers , 2015 .

[7]  José Renato M. de Sousa,et al.  A Theoretical Approach to Predict the Fatigue Life of Flexible Pipes , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[8]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Numerical and Analytical Modeling of Unbonded Flexible Risers , 2009 .

[9]  I Kraincanic,et al.  Slip initiation and progression in helical armouring layers of unbonded flexible pipes and its effect on pipe bending behaviour , 2001 .

[10]  Celso P. Pesce,et al.  A Consistent Analytical Model to Predict the Structural Behavior of Flexible Risers Subjected to Combined Loads , 2004 .

[11]  J. A. Witz A case study in the cross-section analysis of flexible risers , 1996 .

[12]  Geir Skeie,et al.  Efficient Fatigue Analysis of Helix Elements in Umbilicals and Flexible Risers: Theory and Applications , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[13]  Minghao Chen Fatigue analysis of flexible pipes using alternative element types and bend stiffener data , 2011 .

[14]  J. A. Witz,et al.  On the flexural structural behaviour of flexible pipes, umbilicals and marine cables , 1992 .

[15]  Wenyong Tang,et al.  Time domain approach for coupled cross-flow and in-line VIV induced fatigue damage of steel catenary riser at touchdown zone , 2015 .

[16]  J. A. Witz,et al.  On the axial-torsional structural behaviour of flexible pipes, umbilicals and marine cables , 1992 .

[17]  Anders Lyckegaard,et al.  A method for prediction of the equilibrium state of a long and slender wire on a frictionless toroid applied for analysis of flexible pipe structures , 2012 .

[18]  Carlos Magluta,et al.  A Study on the Response of a Flexible Pipe to Combined Axisymmetric Loads , 2013 .

[19]  R. Brook,et al.  Cumulative Damage in Fatigue: A Step towards Its Understanding , 1969 .

[20]  George Carneiro Campello,et al.  Structural response of a flexible pipe with damaged tensile armor wires under pure tension , 2014 .

[21]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  On the multi-scale computation of un-bonded flexible risers , 2010 .

[22]  Leilei Dong,et al.  An Analytical Model to Predict the Bending Behavior of Unbonded Flexible Pipes , 2013 .

[23]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Non-Linear Hysteretic Seabed Model for Catenary Pipeline Contact , 2009 .

[24]  Giulio Alfano,et al.  Numerical derivation of constitutive models for unbonded flexible risers , 2009 .

[25]  Qianjin Yue,et al.  Validity and limitation of analytical models for the bending stress of a helical wire in unbonded flexible pipes , 2015 .

[26]  S. Sævik Theoretical and experimental studies of stresses in flexible pipes , 2011 .

[27]  Carlos Magluta,et al.  On the response of flexible risers to loads imposed by hydraulic collars , 2009 .

[28]  Carl M. Larsen,et al.  Estimating Distributions for Extreme Response of a Catenary Riser , 2007 .

[29]  Annette M. Harte,et al.  THREE DIMENSIONAL ANALYTICAL SIMULATION OF FLEXIBLE PIPE WALL STRUCTURE , 1992 .