Large-scale aggregation analysis of eukaryotic proteins reveals an involvement of intrinsically disordered regions in protein folding

[1]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Intrinsic Ribosome Destabilization Underlies Translation and Provides an Organism with a Strategy of Environmental Sensing. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[2]  J. Buchner,et al.  The HSP90 chaperone machinery , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  H. Imataka,et al.  Cell-free analysis of polyQ-dependent protein aggregation and its inhibition by chaperone proteins. , 2016, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  Minoru Kanehisa,et al.  KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  David Balchin,et al.  In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control , 2016, Science.

[6]  Motonori Ota,et al.  Multiple-Localization and Hub Proteins , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  J. Frydman,et al.  The Mechanism and Function of Group II Chaperonins. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  V. Uversky,et al.  Functional roles of transiently and intrinsically disordered regions within proteins , 2015, The FEBS journal.

[9]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Single-molecule Analyses of the Dynamics of Heat Shock Protein 104 (Hsp104) and Protein Aggregates* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Juancarlos Chan,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Steven E. Brenner,et al.  SCOPe: Structural Classification of Proteins—extended, integrating SCOP and ASTRAL data and classification of new structures , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Julie L. Chaney,et al.  Folding the proteome. , 2013, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  E. Deuerling,et al.  Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[15]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Global analysis of chaperone effects using a reconstituted cell-free translation system , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  F. Hartl,et al.  DnaK functions as a central hub in the E. coli chaperone network. , 2012, Cell reports.

[17]  Edith D. Wong,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Takashi Gojobori,et al.  Binary classification of protein molecules into intrinsically disordered and ordered segments , 2011, BMC Structural Biology.

[19]  Ricardo Graña-Montes,et al.  The aggregation properties of Escherichia coli proteins associated with their cellular abundance. , 2011, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  Zhaolei Zhang,et al.  An atlas of chaperone–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Bimodal protein solubility distribution revealed by an aggregation analysis of the entire ensemble of Escherichia coli proteins , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  S. Teichmann,et al.  Tight Regulation of Unstructured Proteins: From Transcript Synthesis to Protein Degradation , 2008, Science.

[24]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Defining the TRiC/CCT interactome links chaperonin function to stabilization of newly-made proteins with complex topologies , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[25]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Co-translational Binding of GroEL to Nascent Polypeptides Is Followed by Post-translational Encapsulation by GroES to Mediate Protein Folding* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic Disorder Is a Common Feature of Hub Proteins from Four Eukaryotic Interactomes , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. , 2005, Genes & development.

[28]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.

[29]  Liam J. McGuffin,et al.  Protein structure prediction servers at University College London , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Co-translational Involvement of the Chaperonin GroEL in the Folding of Newly Translated Polypeptides* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[32]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  C. Dobson Protein folding and misfolding , 2003, Nature.

[35]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[36]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[37]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[38]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[39]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  V. Uversky,et al.  Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.

[41]  J. Weissman,et al.  A census of glutamine/asparagine-rich regions: implications for their conserved function and the prediction of novel prions. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Masasuke Yoshida,et al.  Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[44]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  D T Jones,et al.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  David C. Jones,et al.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. , 1997, Structure.

[47]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[50]  Takeshi Kawabata,et al.  GTOP: a database of protein structures predicted from genome sequences , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[51]  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new , 1997 .

[52]  J. Ellis Proteins as molecular chaperones , 1987, Nature.