Tangible Symbols as an AAC Option for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies

Abstract We reviewed nine studies evaluating the use of tangible symbols in AAC interventions for 129 individuals with developmental disabilities. Studies were summarized in terms of participants, tangible symbols used, communication functions/skills targeted for intervention, intervention procedures, evaluation designs, and main findings. Tangible symbols mainly consisted of three-dimensional whole objects or partial objects. Symbols were taught as requests for preferred objects/activities in five studies with additional communication functions (e.g., naming, choice making, protesting) also taught in three studies. One study focused on naming activities. With intervention, 54% (n = 70) of the participants, who ranged from 3 to 20 years of age, learned to use tangible symbols to communicate. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution due to pre-experimental or quasi-experimental designs in five of the nine studies. Overall, tangible symbols appear promising, but additional studies are needed to establish their relative merits as a communication mode for people with developmental disabilities.

[1]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing Tangible Symbols, Picture Exchange, and a Direct Selection Response for Enabling Two Boys with Developmental Disabilities to Access Preferred Stimuli , 2013 .

[2]  E. Trief,et al.  A Field Study of a Standardized Tangible Symbol System for Learners who are Visually Impaired and have Multiple Disabilities , 2013 .

[3]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Behavioral interventions for rumination and operant vomiting in individuals with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[4]  E. Trief,et al.  Teachers’ and Speech-Language Pathologists’ Perceptions about a Tangible Symbols Intervention: Efficacy, Generalization, and Recommendations , 2011, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[5]  Emad Ali The Effectiveness of Combining Tangible Symbols with the Picture Exchange Communication System to Teach Requesting Skills to Children with Multiple Disabilities Including Visual Impairment. , 2011 .

[6]  E. Trief,et al.  The Selection of Tangible Symbols by Educators of Students with Visual Impairments and Additional Disabilities , 2010 .

[7]  E. Trief,et al.  The Development of a Universal Tangible Symbol System , 2009 .

[8]  J. Carr The handbook of intellectual disability and clinical psychology practice , 2009 .

[9]  Shelley K. Lund,et al.  Teaching Young People who are Blind and have Autism to Make Requests Using a Variation on the Picture Exchange Communication System with Tactile Symbols: A Preliminary Investigation , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[10]  E. Trief The Use of Tangible Cues for Children with Multiple Disabilities and Visual Impairment , 2007 .

[11]  D. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative & Alternative Communication: Supporting Children & Adults With Complex Communication Needs , 2006 .

[12]  Craig H. Kennedy,et al.  Single-Case Designs for Educational Research , 2004 .

[13]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  One-To-One Training: Instructional Procedures for Learners With Developmental Disabilities , 2004 .

[14]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: integrative review , 2002 .

[15]  C. Rowland,et al.  Tangible symbols, tangible outcomes , 2000 .

[16]  Jennifer Angelo,et al.  Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Strategies for Learners With Severe Disabilities , 1992 .

[17]  J. Reichle,et al.  Teaching an Adolescent with Blindness and Severe Disabilities: A Correspondence between Requesting and Selecting Preferred Objects , 1989 .

[18]  Devender R. Banda,et al.  Adapting the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) for a Student with Visual Impairment and Autism: A Case Study , 2009 .

[19]  T. Iacono,et al.  Autism Spectrum Disorders And Aac , 2009 .

[20]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Assessing correspondence following acquisition of an exchange-based communication system. , 2007, Research in developmental disabilities.

[21]  Lori Frost,et al.  The picture exchange communication system : training manual , 2002 .

[22]  M. Carter,et al.  Establishing a repertoire of requesting for a student with severe and multiple disabilities using tangible symbols and naturalistic time delay , 1994 .

[23]  Charity Rowland,et al.  Tangible symbols: symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments , 1989 .