The Price of Strict and Light Robustness in Timetable Information

In timetable information in public transport the goal is to search for a good path between an origin and a destination. Usually, the travel time and the number of transfers will be minimized. In this paper, we consider robust timetable information; i.e., we want to identify a path that will bring the passenger to the planned destination even in the case of delays. The classic notion of strict robustness leads to the problem of identifying those transfer activities that will never break in any of the expected delay scenarios. We show that this is, in general, a strongly NP-hard problem. Therefore, we propose a conservative heuristic which identifies a large subset of these strictly robust transfer activities in polynomial time by dynamic programming and so allows us to efficiently find strictly robust paths. We also transfer the notion of light robustness, originally introduced for timetabling, to timetable information. In computational experiments we then study the price of strict and light robustness: how much longer is the travel time of a robust path than of a shortest one, according to the published schedule? Based on the 2011 train schedule within Germany, we quantitatively explore the trade-off between the level of guaranteed robustness and the increase in travel time. Strict robustness turns out to be too conservative, whereas light robustness is promising: a modest level of guarantees is achievable at a reasonable price for the majority of passengers.

[1]  Hande Yaman,et al.  The Robust Shortest Path Problem with Interval Data , 2012 .

[2]  Yang Jian,et al.  On the robust shortest path problem , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  A Gerodimos,et al.  Robust Discrete Optimization and its Applications , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Michael Kolonko,et al.  Cost-benefit-analysis of Investments into Railway Networks with Periodically Timed Schedules , 2001 .

[5]  Christina Büsing The Exact Subgraph Recoverable Robust Shortest Path Problem , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[6]  Matthias Müller-Hannemann,et al.  Fully Dynamic Speed-Up Techniques for Multi-criteria Shortest Path Searches in Time-Dependent Networks , 2010, SEA.

[7]  Roberto Montemanni,et al.  A branch and bound algorithm for the robust shortest path problem with interval data , 2004, Oper. Res. Lett..

[8]  Christos D. Zaroliagis,et al.  Timetable Information: Models and Algorithms , 2004, ATMOS.

[9]  Matthias Müller-Hannemann,et al.  The Price of Robustness in Timetable Information , 2011, ATMOS.

[10]  Igor Averbakh,et al.  Interval data minmax regret network optimization problems , 2004, Discret. Appl. Math..

[11]  Sebastian Stiller,et al.  Online railway delay management: Hardness, simulation and computation , 2011, Simul..

[12]  Leena Suhl,et al.  Design of Customer-oriented Dispatching Support for Railways , 2001 .

[13]  Matthias Müller-Hannemann,et al.  Efficient Timetable Information in the Presence of Delays , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[14]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Robust discrete optimization and network flows , 2003, Math. Program..

[15]  Adam Kasperski,et al.  The robust shortest path problem in series-parallel multidigraphs with interval data , 2006, Oper. Res. Lett..

[16]  Roberto Montemanni,et al.  The robust shortest path problem with interval data via Benders decomposition , 2005, 4OR.

[17]  Mathias Schnee,et al.  Fully realistic multi-criteria timetable information systems , 2010 .

[18]  Matteo Fischetti,et al.  Light Robustness , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[19]  Martine Labbé,et al.  Reduction approaches for robust shortest path problems , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Yann Disser,et al.  Multi-criteria Shortest Paths in Time-Dependent Train Networks , 2008, WEA.

[21]  Pawel Zielinski,et al.  The computational complexity of the relative robust shortest path problem with interval data , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Leena Suhl,et al.  A note on the online nature of the railway delay management problem , 2011, Networks.

[23]  Rolf H. Möhring,et al.  The Concept of Recoverable Robustness, Linear Programming Recovery, and Railway Applications , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[24]  Allen L. Soyster,et al.  Technical Note - Convex Programming with Set-Inclusive Constraints and Applications to Inexact Linear Programming , 1973, Oper. Res..

[25]  Rolf H. Möhring,et al.  Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization: Models and Techniques for Transportation Systems , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[26]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust Convex Optimization , 1998, Math. Oper. Res..

[27]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[28]  Daniele Frigioni,et al.  Recoverable Robustness in Shunting and Timetabling , 2009, Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization.

[29]  Sebastian Stiller,et al.  Computing delay resistant railway timetables , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Daniel Vanderpooten,et al.  Approximation Complexity of min-max (Regret) Versions of Shortest Path, Spanning Tree, and Knapsack , 2005, ESA.

[31]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1978 .

[32]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Optimization , 2021, ICORES.