Operating Point Optimization of Auxiliary Power Unit Based on Dynamic Combined Cost Map and Particle Swarm Optimization

Series hybrid electric vehicles improvements in fuel consumption and emissions directly depend on the operating point of the auxiliary power unit (APU). A new APU operating point optimization approach based on dynamic combined cost map (DCM) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) is presented in this paper. The influence of coolant temperature, catalyst temperature, and air/fuel (A/F) ratio on fuel consumption characteristics and HC, CO, NOx emission characteristics are quantitatively analyzed first. Then, the DCM is derived by combining the individual cost maps with predefined weighting factors, so as to balance the potentially conflicting goals of fuel consumption and emissions reduction in the choice of operating point. The PSO is utilized to search the optimum APU operating point in the DCM. Finally, bench experiments under three typical driving cycles show that, compared with the results of the traditional static steady-state fuel consumption map-based APU operating point optimization approach, the proposed DCM and PSO-based approach shows significant improvements in emission performance, at the expense of a slight drop in fuel efficiency.

[1]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  System Integration and Power-Flow Management for a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using Supercapacitors and Batteries , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[2]  Ali Emadi,et al.  Modern electric, hybrid electric, and fuel cell vehicles : fundamentals, theory, and design , 2009 .

[3]  Hamid A. Toliyat,et al.  An efficient processor-based online generation of time-optimal trajectories , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[4]  Keith Wipke,et al.  HEV Control Strategy for Real-Time Optimization of Fuel Economy and Emissions , 2000 .

[5]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[6]  Andries Petrus Engelbrecht,et al.  A Cooperative approach to particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Giovanni Fiengo,et al.  Control of Auxiliary Power Unit for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Saravanan Muthiah,et al.  Investigation on the Effect of Coolant Temperature on the Performance and Emissions of Naturally Aspirated Gasoline Engine , 2011 .

[9]  Volkan Sezer,et al.  A Novel ECMS and Combined Cost Map Approach for High-Efficiency Series Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Kay-Soon Low,et al.  Photovoltaic Model Identification Using Particle Swarm Optimization With Inverse Barrier Constraint , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[11]  S. Barsali,et al.  Techniques to Control the Electricity Generation in a Series Hybrid Electrical Vehicle , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  Pierluigi Pisu,et al.  A Comparative Study Of Supervisory Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Metin Gokasan,et al.  Sliding mode optimum control for APU of series hybrid electric vehicles , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Bijaya Ketan Panigrahi,et al.  Hybrid swarm intelligence methods for energy management in hybrid electric vehicles , 2013 .

[15]  Giovanni Fiengo,et al.  Dual-UEGO active catalyst control for emissions reduction: design and experimental validation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  Jorge Moreno,et al.  Energy-management system for a hybrid electric vehicle, using ultracapacitors and neural networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[18]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  Three-way catalyst diagnostics for advanced emissions control systems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[19]  Binggang Cao,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle control strategy parameter , 2008, 2008 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[20]  Qi Li,et al.  Parameter Identification for PEM Fuel-Cell Mechanism Model Based on Effective Informed Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[21]  Guoming Zhu,et al.  Trajectory Optimization for the Engine–Generator Operation of a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[22]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)–Based MPPT for PV With Reduced Steady-State Oscillation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[23]  S. Barsali,et al.  A control strategy to minimize fuel consumption of series hybrid electric vehicles , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[24]  I. Kolmanovsky,et al.  Control strategy optimization for a series hybrid vehicle , 2006 .

[25]  F. R. Salmasi,et al.  Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Evolution, Classification, Comparison, and Future Trends , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Hongwen He,et al.  A Comparative Study of Supervisory Control Strategies for a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle , 2009, 2009 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference.

[27]  Yanying Wang,et al.  Dynamic modeling of a three-way catalyst for SI engine exhaust emission control , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[28]  M. Gokasan,et al.  Sliding mode based powertrain control for efficiency improvement in series hybrid-electric vehicles , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[29]  N. Schofield,et al.  Operation of a hybrid PM generator in a series hybrid EV power-train , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.