Multi-processor scheduling to minimize flow time with ε resource augmentation

We investigate the problem of online scheduling of jobs to minimize flow time and stretch on m identical machines. We consider the case where the algorithm is given either (1+ε)m machines or m machines of speed (1+ε), for arbitrarily small ε > 0. We show that simple randomized and deterministic load balancing algorithms, coupled with simple single machine scheduling strategies such as SRPT (shortest remaining processing time) and SJF (shortest job first), are O(poly(1/ε))-competitive for both flow time and stretch. These are the first results which prove constant factor competitive ratios for flow time or stretch with arbitrarily small resource augmentation. Both the randomized and the deterministic load balancing algorithms are non-migratory and do immediate dispatch of jobs.The randomized algorithm just allocates each incoming job to a random machine. Hence this algorithm is non-clairvoyant, and coupled with SETF (shortest elapsed time first), yields the first non-clairvoyant algorithm which is constant competitive for minimizing flow time with arbitrarily small resource augmentation. The deterministic algorithm that we analyze is due to Avrahami and Azar. For this algorithm, we show O(1/ε)-competitiveness for total flow time and stretch, and also for their Lp norms, for any fixed p ≥ 1.

[1]  Michael A. Bender,et al.  Flow and stretch metrics for scheduling continuous job streams , 1998, SODA '98.

[2]  Stefano Leonardi,et al.  Approximating total flow time on parallel machines , 1997, STOC '97.

[3]  Noga Alon,et al.  Approximation schemes for scheduling , 1997, SODA '97.

[4]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Ancient and New Algorithms for Load Balancing in the lp Norm , 1998, SODA '98.

[5]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Non-clairvoyant scheduling , 1994, SODA '93.

[6]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Non-clairvoyant scheduling to minimize the average flow time on single and parallel machines , 2001, STOC '01.

[7]  Sanjeev Khanna,et al.  Approximation schemes for preemptive weighted flow time , 2002, STOC '02.

[8]  Nikhil Bansal,et al.  Minimizing weighted flow time , 2007, ACM Trans. Algorithms.

[9]  Mor Harchol-Balter,et al.  Web servers under overload: How scheduling can help , 2006, TOIT.

[10]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Minimizing the flow time without migration , 1999, STOC '99.

[11]  Kirk Pruhs,et al.  Online weighted flow time and deadline scheduling , 2001, J. Discrete Algorithms.

[12]  Bala Kalyanasundaram,et al.  Speed is as powerful as clairvoyance , 2000, JACM.

[13]  Ming-Yang Kao,et al.  Load balancing in the L/sub p/ norm , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[14]  Yossi Azar,et al.  Minimizing Total Flow Time and Total Completion Time with Immediate Dispatching , 2003, SPAA '03.

[15]  Kirk Pruhs,et al.  Server scheduling in the Lp norm: a rising tide lifts all boat , 2003, STOC '03.

[16]  Sanjeev Khanna,et al.  Algorithms for minimizing weighted flow time , 2001, STOC '01.

[17]  Cynthia A. Phillips,et al.  Optimal Time-Critical Scheduling via Resource Augmentation (Extended Abstract) , 1997, Symposium on the Theory of Computing.

[18]  Luca Becchetti,et al.  Scheduling to minimize average stretch without migration , 2000, SODA '00.

[19]  Cynthia A. Phillips,et al.  Optimal Time-Critical Scheduling via Resource Augmentation , 1997, STOC '97.

[20]  Jirí Sgall,et al.  Approximation Schemes for Scheduling on Uniformly Related and Identical Parallel Machines , 1999, ESA.

[21]  B. Awerbuch,et al.  Load Balancing in the Lp Norm , 1995, FOCS 1995.

[22]  References , 1971 .

[23]  Mor Harchol-Balter,et al.  Connection Scheduling in Web Servers , 1999, USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems.

[24]  Rajmohan Rajaraman,et al.  Online scheduling to minimize average stretch , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[25]  Mor Harchol-Balter,et al.  Analysis of SRPT scheduling: investigating unfairness , 2001, SIGMETRICS '01.