The spatial distribution of inhibition in preview search

In an inefficient visual search task, when some distractors (old items) temporally precede some others (new items), the old items are excluded from the search, a phenomenon termed visual marking. This effect is said to occur because the locations of the old items are inhibited before the new items appear. The present study used a probe-detection task to examine whether this inhibition occurs only at the precise locations of old items or at and around the locations of old items. We also investigated the effect of inhibition overreaching boundaries to encompass neighboring regions. Participants searched for a target or detected a probe that appeared after the new items appeared. The results revealed that the probe reaction times at locations inside grouped regions were longer than those at a blank region where no items had been presented and were comparable to those at a location occupied by old items. Probe detection was not delayed when the probe was presented near but external to the external boundary of the grouped regions. The overreaching effect was obtained before and after the new items appeared. We conclude that the inhibitory template for visual marking represents clusters of old items for at least 200 ms before the onset of new items, and that this spatial schema is preserved until at least 200 ms after the onset of new items.

[1]  E DITORS,et al.  Who and what. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[2]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  O J Braddick,et al.  ‘Where’ and ‘What’ in Visual Search , 1989, Perception.

[5]  L A Lefton,et al.  Backward and forward masking as a function of stimulus and task parameters. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D G Watson,et al.  Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Previewing distracters reduces their effective contrast , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Mieke Donk,et al.  Prioritized selection in visual search through onset capture and color inhibition: evidence from a probe-dot detection task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.