Subjective Rating and Apparent Magnitude

In category-scaling studies of television impairments, the psychometric functions describing the relationship between subjective rating and stimulus magnitude generally take a simple logistic form. A similar result tends to be approximated in experiments with other kinds of stimuli described by Stevens & Galanter: (1957) as prothetic. It leads to the following simple relationship between category scaling and ratio scaling: t = 1/(1 + N -k ), Here t is subjective rating on a continuous scale varying from 0 to 1, which can be either inferred from the intermediary of a category grading scale or obtained by direct measurement, and Nis apparent magnitude on a ratio scale, normalized to give N = 1 when t = 1/2 The value of the exponent k has not been precisely determined but it is believed to be close to unity. Where unrelated impairments are rated in terms of the same type of response, the scale of apparent magnitude closely approximates a scale of summable subjective magnitude.

[1]  R. D. Prosser,et al.  Subjective quality of television pictures impaired by long-delayed echoes , 1965 .

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Teghtsoonian,et al.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law. , 1971, Psychological review.

[4]  J. Berkson Application of the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay , 1944 .

[5]  G. Ekman,et al.  Note on Subjective Scales of Number , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  N. W. Lewis,et al.  Subjective quality of television pictures with multiple impairments , 1965 .

[7]  W. J. Bray International telecommunication development , 1973 .

[8]  John McKenzie A Comparison of Gaussian and Logistic Categorical Opinion Distribution Models , 1975 .

[9]  An experimental test of the Michels-Helson theory of judgment. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Repeated magnitude estimations with a variable standard: Sequential effects and other properties , 1973 .

[11]  Stanley M. Soliday,et al.  Picture Quality Judgments in a Digital Television System , 1974 .

[12]  B. Rosner The Power Law and Subjective Scales of Number , 1965, Perceptual and Motor Skills.

[13]  John Allnatt Opinion-distribution model for subjective rating studies , 1973 .

[14]  B. Rosner Comment on Note on Numerical Behaviour , 1965, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  R. D. Prosser,et al.  Subjective quality of colour-television pictures impaired by random noise , 1965 .

[16]  S. S. Stevens Intensity functions in sensory systems. , 1967, International journal of neurology.

[17]  G. Ekman,et al.  Is the Power Law a Special Case of Fechner's Law? , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[18]  J W Allnatt Subjective assessment of impairments in television pictures. , 1971, Applied ergonomics.