Gender Bias in STEM Fields

The current study focuses on girls’ and women’s reported experiences with gender bias in fields related to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). In the first set of analyses, I examined whether the prevalence of self-reported gender bias varied depending on the educational context. I then examined whether experiencing gender bias was associated with lower STEM self-concept and, if so, whether having a supportive network of STEM peers would buffer this effect. Data were collected through a self-report survey that was administered to high school girls who aspired to have STEM careers, women in STEM undergraduate majors, and women in STEM doctoral programs. Overall, 61% of participants reported experiencing gender bias in the past year, but the prevalence rate varied according to their phase of education and field of study. In particular, women in math-intensive undergraduate majors were especially likely to encounter gender bias, which predominately originated from male peers in their major. As expected, participants who encountered gender bias had lower STEM self-concept than participants who did not. However, this effect was attenuated for participants who also had a supportive network of STEM peers. These findings suggest that positive peer connections may be a valuable resource for girls and women in the STEM pipeline.

[1]  L. Cortina,et al.  Policing Gender at Work: Intersections of Harassment Based on Sex and Sexuality , 2008 .

[2]  C. Hill,et al.  Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[3]  Richard P. DeShon,et al.  Climate perceptions matter: a meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .

[5]  C. Steele,et al.  Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Gerhard Sonnert,et al.  Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Effects of Faculty, Fields, and Institutions Over Time* , 2007 .

[7]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas , 2002 .

[8]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices , 1994 .

[9]  Mary Anne Devanna Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[10]  Sarah-K. McDonald,et al.  Female and male adolescents' subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[11]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance , 2015 .

[12]  Jane L. Lehr,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2001 .

[13]  Faye J. Crosby,et al.  The Denial of Personal Discrimination , 1984 .

[14]  S. Lemon,et al.  The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory : Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism , 2001 .

[15]  L. Cortina,et al.  Derogation, Discrimination, and (Dis)Satisfaction With Jobs in Science , 2013 .

[16]  Ming-Te Wang,et al.  Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields. , 2013, Developmental review : DR.

[17]  M. M. Chemers,et al.  Longitudinal Associations among Undergraduates' Research Experience, Self-Efficacy, and Identity. , 2015 .

[18]  Jacquelynne S Eccles,et al.  Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Allan L. Fisher,et al.  The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science , 2000 .

[21]  Abbe H. Herzig ‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics , 2004 .

[22]  Richard F. Martell,et al.  Male-female differences: A computer simulation. , 1996 .

[23]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[26]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Motivation to Learn Science: Differences Related to Gender, Class Type, and Ability , 2000 .

[27]  L. Fitzgerald,et al.  Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Social Cognitive Approach to Career Development: An Overview , 1996 .

[29]  Campbell Leaper,et al.  Friendship Groups, Personal Motivation, and Gender in Relation to High School Students' STEM Career Interest , 2013 .

[30]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses , 2001 .

[31]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. , 2012 .

[32]  H. Watt,et al.  The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths , 2006 .

[33]  J. E. Stake,et al.  Science Enrichment Programs for Gifted High School Girls and Boys: Predictors of Program Impact on Science Confidence and Motivation. , 2001 .

[34]  L. Cortina,et al.  Sex-based harassment in employment: new insights into gender and context. , 2014, Law and human behavior.

[35]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Mere belonging: the power of social connections. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Lorelle L. Espinosa,et al.  Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics , 2011 .

[37]  G. Breakwell,et al.  Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: the case of gender and science education. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[38]  S. Graham,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of racial/ethnic discrimination during adolescence: does the source of discrimination matter? , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[39]  J. E. Stake,et al.  Understanding Male Bias Against Girls and Women in Science1 , 2003 .

[40]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  C. Leaper,et al.  Latina and European American Girls’ Experiences with Academic Sexism and their Self-Concepts in Mathematics and Science During Adolescence , 2010, Sex roles.

[42]  Michelle R. Hebl,et al.  Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants , 2002 .

[43]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[44]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  On Conceptualizing and Assessing Social Cognitive Constructs in Career Research: A Measurement Guide , 2006 .

[45]  C. Leaper,et al.  Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. , 2008, Child development.

[46]  Jane Stout,et al.  STEMing the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  S. Ceci,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological Sex Differences in Math-intensive Fields on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[48]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[49]  L. Cortina,et al.  Coping in context: sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  N. Dasgupta,et al.  Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model , 2011 .

[51]  Erica S. Weisgram,et al.  Effects of Learning about Gender Discrimination on Adolescent Girls' Attitudes Toward and Interest in Science , 2007 .

[52]  J. Gross,et al.  Signaling Threat , 2007, Psychological science.

[53]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[54]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Self-Silencing to Sexism , 2010 .

[55]  Ursula Kessels,et al.  Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypic peers relate to liking for school subjects , 2005 .

[56]  S. Karau,et al.  Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. , 2002, Psychological review.