An analysis of salary mechanisms in the sharing economy: The interaction between streamers and unions

Abstract Live streaming, a recently emerged service in the sharing economy era, is already very popular in China and is growing in the US market. Besides streamers (those who make the content) and the platform itself, unions of streamers are important stakeholders in live streaming platforms because they act as the streamers' agents. Because the union's salary mechanism will significantly influence the behavior of streamers, in this paper, we investigate the interaction between the streamers and unions from the perspective of salary mechanism. Specifically, we introduce a salary mechanism denoted by ( θ , R , T ) for the union and then set up a game model between the union and streamers. While the proceeds of streamers depend on their efforts, the union's salary mechanism also significantly influences the efforts of streamers in the union. Streamers determine whether to join the union or not, as well as their efforts under the two alternatives. The union's goal is to optimize its salary mechanism, as well as to determine its effort level in the streamer's virtual room. Our results show that: (i) whether a streamer will join the union depends on both the union's salary mechanism and the streamer's ability; (ii) the salary mechanism ( θ , R , T ) can be used to implement either the elite talent strategy or the huge-crowd strategy; and (iii) the union's optimal salary mechanism is significantly influenced by the platform's share rates to the union and streamers. In this paper, the properties of the union's optimal salary mechanism are analyzed. This paper contributes to the literature by being the first to incorporate a salary mechanism into studies of the live streaming economy.

[1]  Juan Zhang,et al.  Cooperative Advertising with Accrual Rate in a Dynamic Supply Chain , 2017, Dyn. Games Appl..

[2]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Fangruo Chen,et al.  Salesforce Incentives, Market Information, and Production/Inventory Planning , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Guoming Lai,et al.  Provision of Incentives for Information Acquisition: Forecast-Based Contracts vs. Menus of Linear Contracts , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Jaemin Jung,et al.  Impact of viewer engagement on gift-giving in live video streaming , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[7]  Kaja J. Fietkiewicz,et al.  Information Behavior on Social Live Streaming Services , 2016 .

[8]  Ling-Chieh Kung,et al.  The Optimal Pricing Strategy for Two-Sided Platform Delivery In the Sharing Economy , 2017 .

[9]  Andruid Kerne,et al.  Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media , 2014, CHI.

[10]  Son Ku Kim,et al.  Limited Liability and Bonus Contracts , 1997 .

[11]  Gohar Feroz Khan,et al.  Virality over YouTube: an empirical analysis , 2014, Internet Res..

[12]  Prasad A. Naik,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications , 2003 .

[13]  Gwendal Simon,et al.  YouTube live and Twitch: a tour of user-generated live streaming systems , 2015, MMSys.

[14]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect , 2013 .

[15]  Jamie Woodcock,et al.  ‘It’s like the gold rush’: the lives and careers of professional video game streamers on Twitch.tv , 2017 .

[16]  Yafei Dai,et al.  Understanding the Gift-Sending Interaction on Live-Streaming Video Websites , 2017, HCI.

[17]  Guoming Lai,et al.  Salesforce Contracting Under Demand Censorship , 2013, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  Interactive live-streaming technologies and approaches for web-based applications , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[20]  Jagmohan S. Raju,et al.  Quota-Based Compensation Plans for Multiterritory Heterogeneous Salesforces , 1996 .

[21]  Juzhi Zhang,et al.  Equilibrium and incentives for supervisor-postgraduate collaborations: A game-theoretic approach , 2019, RAIRO Oper. Res..

[22]  Juzhi Zhang,et al.  A local seller's app channel strategy concerning delivery , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[23]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Equilibrium decisions for an innovation crowdsourcing platform , 2019 .

[24]  Amiya K. Basu,et al.  Salesforce Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective , 1985 .

[25]  Chen-Yi Lin,et al.  Personalized channel recommendation on live streaming platforms , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[26]  Brian Wu,et al.  Incumbent Repositioning with Decision Biases , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[27]  Qun Zhao,et al.  Determinants of live streamers' continuance broadcasting intentions on Twitch: A self-determination theory perspective , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[28]  Eun-Soo Park,et al.  Incentive Contracting under Limited Liability , 1995 .

[29]  T. Choi,et al.  Values of food leftover sharing platforms in the sharing economy , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[30]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Why do Users Broadcast? Examining Individual Motives and Social Capital on Social Live Streaming Platforms , 2016, PACIS.

[31]  Jiun-Long Huang,et al.  Live streaming channel recommendation using HITS algorithm , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics - Taiwan.

[32]  Anja Schöttner,et al.  Optimal Sales Force Compensation in Dynamic Settings: Commissions vs. Bonuses , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Andy A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Dynamics Under Price and Service Competition , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[34]  Patricia G. Lange Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Yu Wang,et al.  Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  K. Sudhir,et al.  Do Bonuses Enhance Sales Productivity? A Dynamic Structural Analysis of Bonus-Based Compensation Plans , 2013, Mark. Sci..