On the Verifiability of Evolutionary Psychological Theories: An Analysis of the Psychology of Scientific Persuasion

Evolutionary psychological theories have engendered much skepticism in the modern scientific climate. Why? We argue that, although sometimes couched in the language of unfalsifiability, the skepticism results primarily from the perception that evolutionary theories are less verifiable than traditional psychological theories. It is more difficult to be convinced of the veracity of an evolutionary psychological theory because an additional layer of inference must be logically traversed: One not only has to be persuaded that a particular model of contemporary psychological processes uniquely predicts observed phenomena, one must also be persuaded that a model of deeply historical processes uniquely predicts the model of psychological processes. This analysis of the psychology of scientific persuasion yields a number of specific suggestions for the development, testing, and discussion of evolutionary psychological theories.

[1]  T. Ketelaar,et al.  Are Evolutionary Explanations Unfalsifiable? Evolutionary Psychology and the Lakatosian Philosophy of Science , 2000 .

[2]  W. N. SHAW,et al.  The Advancement of Science , 1880, Science.

[3]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror Management Theory of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements , 1997 .

[4]  J. Simpson,et al.  Evolution and relationships: A call for integration. , 2001 .

[5]  S. J. Scher.  ARE ADAPTATIONS NECESSARILY GENETIC , 1999 .

[6]  J. Archer,et al.  Sex differences in social behavior. Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? , 1996, The American psychologist.

[7]  M. Schaller.  Ancestral environments and motivated social perception: Goal-like blasts from the evolutionary past. , 2003 .

[8]  E. Higgins.  Increasingly Complex but Less Interesting Articles: Scientific Progress or Regulatory Problem? , 1992 .

[9]  R. Kurzban,et al.  Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Sherif.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[11]  M. Schaller,et al.  THE COMPLEXITY OF THINKING ACROSS CULTURES: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CULTURE AND SITUATIONAL CONTEXT , 2001 .

[12]  P. Pollard.  Natural selection for the selection task: limits to social exchange theory , 1990, Cognition.

[13]  Lucian Gideon Conway,et al.  Influence of Impression-Management Goals on the Emerging Contents of Group Stereotypes: Support for a Social-Evolutionary Process , 1999 .

[14]  On the Purposes Served by Psychological Research and its Critics , 1998 .

[15]  John Garcia.  Tilting at the Paper Mills of Academe , 1981 .

[16]  Robert C. Richardson,et al.  The prospects for an evolutionary psychology: Human language and human reasoning , 1996, Minds and Machines.

[17]  M. Haselton,et al.  Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[18]  D. Buss,et al.  Human mate poaching: tactics and tempations for infiltrating existing mateships. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  M. Schaller.  Beyond "competing," beyond "compatible." Commentary on J. Archer. , 1997 .

[20]  Human mate poaching: tactics and tempations for infiltrating existing mateships. , 2001 .

[21]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[22]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[23]  D. Kenrick,et al.  Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  M. Grace.  A logical point of view , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[25]  M. Schaller.  Beyond "Competing," Beyond "Compatible" , 2004 .

[26]  G. Gigerenzer.  Ecological intelligence: An adaptation for frequencies , 1997 .

[27]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[28]  M. Ghiselin,et al.  Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity , 1991, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[29]  A. Kruglanski.  That "vision thing": the state of theory in social and personality psychology at the edge of the new millennium. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Prediction and accommodation in evolutionary psychology , 2000 .

[31]  H Löe,et al.  The end of science? , 1997, European journal of oral sciences.

[32]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[33]  Tom Pyszczynski,et al.  A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews , 1991 .

[34]  M. Tomasello.  The Human Adaptation for Culture , 1999 .

[35]  E. Wilson,et al.  Genes, mind, and culture : the coevolutionary process , 1982 .

[36]  David L. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[37]  D. Buss,et al.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. , 1993, Psychological review.

[38]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[39]  A. Eagly,et al.  Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. , 1989 .

[40]  R. Peters,et al.  Tautology in Evolution and Ecology , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[41]  J. Simpson,et al.  The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  P. Ostrander.  Science in process , 1978 .

[43]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[44]  P. Kitcher.  The Advancement of Science , 1993 .

[45]  R. Lewontin.  ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[46]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The psychological foundations of culture. , 1992 .

[47]  M. Wallach,et al.  When Experiments Serve Little Purpose , 1998 .

[48]  Noise, logic, and the span of time. , 1999 .

[49]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[50]  M. Brewer,et al.  Hierarchical Evolutionary Theory: There Is an Alternative, and It's Not Creationism , 1995 .

[51]  L. Cosmides.  The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task , 1989, Cognition.

[52]  Joe Cain,et al.  Progress and its problems , 1999 .

[53]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[54]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  On the Conceptual Disconfirmation of Theories , 1981 .

[55]  P. Kitcher,et al.  Précis of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[56]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Evolution of Cognition , 2001 .

[58]  A. Eagly,et al.  The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles , 1987 .

[59]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Evolution of Culture , 1999, Evolution.

[60]  W. Bechtel.  Philosophy of Science : An Overview for Cognitive Science , 1988 .

[61]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1970 .

[62]  J. Simpson,et al.  Why social psychology and evolutionary psychology need one another , 1997 .

[63]  B. Latané,et al.  Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. , 1996 .