Multisource emission retrieval within a biogas plant based on inverse dispersion calculations—a real-life example

Open digestate storage tanks were identified as one of the main methane (CH4) emitters of a biogas plant. The main purpose of this paper is to determine these emission rates using an inverse dispersion technique in conjunction with open-path tunable diode laser spectroscopy (OP-TDLS) concentration measurements for multisource reconstruction. Since the condition number, a measure of “ill-conditioned” matrices, strongly influences the accuracy of source reconstruction, it is used as a diagnostic of error sensitivity. The investigations demonstrate that the condition number for a given source-sensor configuration in the highly disturbed flow field within the plant significantly depends on the meteorological conditions (e.g., wind speed, stratification, wind direction, etc.). The CH4 emissions are retrieved by removing unrepresentative periods with high condition numbers, which indicate uncertainty in recovering the individual sources. In a final step, the CH4 emissions are compared with the maximum biological methane potential (BMP) in the digestate analyzed under laboratory conditions. The retrieved methane emission rates represent an average of 50 % of the maximum BMP of the stored digestate in the winter months, while they comprised an average of 85 % during the measurement campaigns in the summer months. The results indicate that the open tanks have the potential to represent a substantial emission source even during colder periods.

[1]  Sonja Siegl,et al.  Green Electricity From Biomass, Part I: Environmental Impacts of Direct Life Cycle Emissions , 2011 .

[2]  Marcus Hirtl,et al.  USER EXPERIENCE WITH MODEL VALIDATION EXERCISES , 2008 .

[3]  T. Flesch,et al.  Performance of a dispersion model to estimate methane loss from cattle in pens. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  G. Rau,et al.  Evaluation of Three Dispersion Models for the Trbovlje Power Plant, Slovenia , 2007 .

[5]  P Kjeldsen,et al.  Quantification of multiple methane emission sources at landfills using a double tracer technique. , 2011, Waste management.

[6]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Validation of a Receptor–Dispersion Model Coupled with a Genetic Algorithm Using Synthetic Data , 2006 .

[7]  Curtis F. Gerald,et al.  APPLIED NUMERICAL ANALYSIS , 1972, The Mathematical Gazette.

[8]  Peter Weiland,et al.  Methane emissions from biogas‐producing facilities within the agricultural sector , 2010 .

[9]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Theory for Reconstruction of an Unknown Number of Contaminant Sources using Probabilistic Inference , 2008 .

[10]  Gilles Delmaire,et al.  Separation problem of industrial particles emissions using a stationary scattering model , 2000, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Martin Piringer,et al.  Odour emissions from a waste treatment plant using an inverse dispersion technique , 2011 .

[12]  Devon E. Worth,et al.  Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester , 2011 .

[13]  J. Gentle Numerical Linear Algebra for Applications in Statistics , 1998 .

[14]  M. Piringer,et al.  Selected results of a model validation exercise , 2009 .

[15]  E. Yee,et al.  Inference of emission rates from multiple sources using Bayesian probability theory. , 2010, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  J. Clemens,et al.  Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from 10 biogas plants within the agricultural sector. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  G. Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Methane emissions from grazing cattle using point-source dispersion. , 2011, Journal of environmental quality.

[18]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Influence of source–sensor geometry on multi-source emission rate estimates , 2008 .

[19]  B. Galle,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions from landfills using a time correlation tracer method based on FTIR absorption spectroscopy. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Marcus Hirtl,et al.  Evaluation of two dispersion models (ADMS-Roads and LASAT) applied to street canyons in Stockholm, London and Berlin , 2007 .

[21]  P. Kjeldsen,et al.  Methane emission quantification from landfills using a double tracer approach , 2007 .

[22]  Lowry A. Harper,et al.  Deducing Ground-to-Air Emissions from Observed Trace Gas Concentrations: A Field Trial with Wind Disturbance , 2004 .

[23]  R. Desjardins,et al.  Multi-Source Emission Determination Using an Inverse-Dispersion Technique , 2009 .

[24]  Tarek Abichou,et al.  Methane emissions from 20 landfills across the United States using vertical radial plume mapping , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[25]  Lowry A. Harper,et al.  Estimating gas emissions from a farm with an inverse-dispersion technique , 2005 .

[26]  John D. Wilson,et al.  Ground-to-Air Gas Emission Rate Inferred from Measured Concentration Rise within a Disturbed Atmospheric Surface Layer , 2010 .

[27]  T. Flesch,et al.  An approach for measuring methane emissions from whole farms. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.