Flexural retrofitting of RC buildings using GFRP/CFRP - A comparative study

The effectiveness of fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs) in retrofitting/repairing of the reinforced concrete (RC) components has been studied in the past to great detail. However, the seismic performance of RC structures retrofitted using FRP composites is yet to be scrutinised in terms of lateral resistance, ductility, and failure mechanism. This is of high importance if the retrofitted structures are to withstand higher seismic ground motions than they were designed for and/or pulse-type ground motions. In a comparative study, this paper reports on the results of an investigation into the flexural strengthening of RC buildings using glass/carbon fibre reinforced polymers (GFRP/CFRP). An 8-storey code-compliant RC building was considered as the case study to represent the medium-rise structures. With a slight intervention in the lateral displacement ductility and provision of the weak-beam strong-column design philosophy, the strengthening design strategy is aimed at increasing the lateral resistance. For this purpose, composite sheets are designed to be applied at the two end regions of all beams and columns on a practical flange-bonded scheme. The nonlinear pushover analysis with lumped plasticity approach was implemented in order to compare the seismic response of the original structure with the GFRP/CFRP retrofitted structures. Following validation of the adopted models, the force–deformation curves of the nonlinear plastic hinges are determined in a rigorous approach considering the material inelastic behaviour, reinforcement details, and dimensions of the members. While the nonlinear results confirm a significant increase in the lateral load carrying capacity using both composite materials, the CFRP improvement was as much as twice of the GFRP. However, the latter provides higher ductility.

[1]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[2]  N. Attari,et al.  Efficiency of Beam–Column Joint Strengthened by FRP Laminates , 2010 .

[3]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Seismic strengthening of an under‐designed RC structure with FRP , 2008 .

[4]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT OF AN IRREGULAR RC FRAME FOR FULL-SCALE 3D PSEUDO-DYNAMIC TESTING PART I: ANALYTICAL MODEL VERIFICATION , 2005 .

[5]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[6]  D. H. Lee,et al.  Experimental study of RC beam–column joints strengthened using CFRP composites , 2010 .

[7]  L. Feo,et al.  Experimental analysis on bond between PBO-FRCM strengthening materials and concrete , 2013 .

[8]  O. Bayrak,et al.  Design Considerations of Carbon Fiber Anchors , 2008 .

[9]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Seismic performance of ductile and nominally ductile reinforced concrete moment resisting frames. I. Experimental study , 1998 .

[10]  Mehmet Inel,et al.  Effects of plastic hinge properties in nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete buildings , 2006 .

[11]  L. De Lorenzis,et al.  Optimal performance-based design of FRP jackets for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames , 2007 .

[12]  Hamid R. Ronagh,et al.  Plastic hinge relocation in RC joints as an alternative method of retrofitting using FRP , 2012 .

[13]  R. Park,et al.  Stress-Strain Behavior of Concrete Confined by Overlapping Hoops at Low and High Strain Rates , 1982 .

[14]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with FRP Laminates , 2000 .

[15]  Soo-Yeon Seo,et al.  Bond strength of near surface-mounted FRP plate for retrofit of concrete structures , 2013 .

[16]  L. Feo,et al.  An experimental study on the long-term behavior of CFRP pultruded laminates suitable to concrete structures rehabilitation , 2008 .

[17]  M. R. Kianoush,et al.  Seismic performance of reinforced concrete moment resisting frames , 2007 .

[18]  L. Feo,et al.  Bond-Slip Relations for PBO-FRCM Materials Externally Bonded to Concrete , 2012 .

[19]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Seismic behaviour of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composites , 2010 .

[20]  Scott T. Smith,et al.  Optimisation of carbon and glass FRP anchor design , 2012 .

[21]  Luciano Feo,et al.  Modeling of composite/concrete interface of RC beams strengthened with composite laminates , 2000 .

[22]  D. Hui,et al.  Studies on FRP-concrete interface with hardening and softening bond-slip law , 2012 .

[23]  L. Feo,et al.  Seismic improvement of RC beam–column joints using hexagonal CFRP bars combined with CFRP sheets , 2013 .

[24]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[25]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[26]  Luciano Feo,et al.  A numerical evaluation of the interlaminar stress state in externally FRP plated RC beams , 2005 .

[27]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Seismic behavior of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates , 2005 .

[28]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings , 2001 .

[29]  Hamid R. Ronagh,et al.  Web-bonded FRPs for relocation of plastic hinges away from the column face in exterior RC joints , 2011 .

[30]  Davood Mostofinejad,et al.  Grooving as Alternative Method of Surface Preparation to Postpone Debonding of FRP Laminates in Concrete Beams , 2010 .

[31]  Antonio De Luca,et al.  Structural Evaluation of Full-Scale FRP-Confined Reinforced Concrete Columns , 2011 .

[32]  D. Oehlers.  Development of design rules for retrofitting by adhesive bonding or bolting either FRP or steel plates to RC beams or slabs in bridges and buildings , 2001 .