Graph theory analysis of DTI tractography in children with traumatic injury

Objective To evaluate brai structural connectivity in children with traumatic injury (TI) following a motor vehicle accident using graph theory analysis of DTI tractography data. Methods DTI scans were acquired on a 3 T Philips scanner from children aged 8–15 years approximately 2 months post-injury. The TI group consisted of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI; n = 44) or extracranial injury (EI; n = 23). Healthy control children (n = 36) were included as an age-matched comparison group. A graph theory approach was applied to DTI tractography data to investigate injury-related differences in connectivity network characteristics. Group differences in structural connectivity evidenced by graph metrics including efficiency, strength, and modularity were assessed using the multi-threshold permutation correction (MTPC) and network-based statistic (NBS) methods. Results At the global network level, global efficiency and mean network strength were lower, and modularity was higher, in the TBI than in the control group. Similarly, strength was lower and modularity higher when comparing the EI to the control group. At the vertex level, nodal efficiency, vertex strength, and average shortest path length were different between all pairwise comparisons of the three groups. Both nodal efficiency and vertex strength were higher in the control than in the EI group, which in turn were higher than in the TBI group. The opposite between-group relationships were seen with path length. These between-group differences were distributed throughout the brain, in both hemispheres. NBS analysis resulted in a cluster of 22 regions and 21 edges with significantly lower connectivity in the TBI group compared to controls. This cluster predominantly involves the frontal lobe and subcortical gray matter structures in both hemispheres. Conclusions Graph theory analysis of DTI tractography showed diffuse differences in structural brain network connectivity in children 2 months post-TI. Network differences were consistent with lower network integration and higher segregation in the injured groups compared to healthy controls. Findings suggest that inclusion of trauma-exposed comparison groups in studies of TBI outcome is warranted to better characterize the indirect effect of stress on brain networks.

[1]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[2]  Lara M. Wierenga,et al.  The development of brain network architecture , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Linda Ewing-Cobbs,et al.  Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of age at injury and time since injury on pathway integrity , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Incorporating outlier detection and replacement into a non-parametric framework for movement and distortion correction of diffusion MR images , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Asarnow,et al.  The UCLA Longitudinal Study of Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Mild Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[8]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[9]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Non-parametric representation and prediction of single- and multi-shell diffusion-weighted MRI data using Gaussian processes , 2015, NeuroImage.

[10]  Tricia L. Merkley,et al.  Neuroimaging correlates of novel psychiatric disorders after pediatric traumatic brain injury. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[11]  C. Lebel,et al.  Longitudinal Development of Human Brain Wiring Continues from Childhood into Adulthood , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Katon,et al.  Association between posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms and functional outcomes in adolescents followed up longitudinally after injury hospitalization. , 2008, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[13]  M. Olff,et al.  Psychobiology of posttraumatic stress disorder in pediatric injury patients: A review of the literature , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Corpus callosum in maltreated children with posttraumatic stress disorder: A diffusion tensor imaging study , 2008, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[15]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Realistic simulation of artefacts in diffusion MRI for validating post-processing correction techniques , 2016, NeuroImage.

[16]  José M. García,et al.  Accelerating Fibre Orientation Estimation from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using GPUs , 2012, PDP.

[17]  David A. Freedman,et al.  A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance Levels , 1983 .

[18]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A network approach to examining injury severity in pediatric TBI , 2017, 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017).

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Erin D. Bigler,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging in moderate-to-severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: changes within an 18 month post-injury interval , 2012, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[21]  Claudia Pedroza,et al.  Frontal and temporal morphometric findings on MRI in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[22]  M. Vavilala,et al.  Health Care Costs 1 Year After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[23]  B. McEwen,et al.  Stress Effects on Neuronal Structure: Hippocampus, Amygdala, and Prefrontal Cortex , 2016, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[24]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Sise,et al.  Long-term posttraumatic stress disorder persists after major trauma in adolescents: new data on risk factors and functional outcome. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  Q. Gong,et al.  Anatomic Insights into Disrupted Small-World Networks in Pediatric Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. , 2017, Radiology.

[27]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[28]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[29]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  Developmental Changes in Brain Network Hub Connectivity in Late Adolescence , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Jocelyne Bachevalier,et al.  Hippocampus, amygdala, and basal ganglia morphometrics in children after moderate‐to‐severe traumatic brain injury , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[31]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Injury cascades in TBI-related neurodegeneration , 2017, Brain injury.

[32]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Graham L. Baum,et al.  Modular Segregation of Structural Brain Networks Supports the Development of Executive Function in Youth , 2016, Current Biology.

[34]  David A Sleet,et al.  CDC Childhood Injury Report: Patterns of Unintentional Injuries Among 0- to 19-Year Olds in the United States, 2000-2006. , 2009, Family & community health.

[35]  Manuel Graña,et al.  Model‐based analysis of multishell diffusion MR data for tractography: How to get over fitting problems , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[37]  Loretta S. Malta,et al.  A meta-analysis of structural brain abnormalities in PTSD , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[38]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[39]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Overcoming the effects of false positives and threshold bias in graph theoretical analyses of neuroimaging data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[40]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Neuroimaging of structural pathology and connectomics in traumatic brain injury: Toward personalized outcome prediction☆ , 2012, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[41]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  L. Ewing-Cobbs,et al.  Altered stress system reactivity after pediatric injury: Relation with post-traumatic stress symptoms , 2017, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[43]  Kyoko Ohashi,et al.  Childhood maltreatment is associated with alteration in global network fiber-tract architecture independent of history of depression and anxiety , 2017, NeuroImage.

[44]  Manfred G Kitzbichler,et al.  Cognitive Effort Drives Workspace Configuration of Human Brain Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Yong He,et al.  Topological organization of the human brain functional connectome across the lifespan , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Robin,et al.  Posttraumatic stress symptomatology after childhood traumatic brain injury. , 1998, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[47]  L. Ewing-Cobbs,et al.  Memory and the hippocampal formation following pediatric traumatic brain injury , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[48]  Virendra Mishra,et al.  Microstructure, Length, and Connection of Limbic Tracts in Normal Human Brain Development , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[49]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data with R , 2020, Use R!.

[50]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[51]  L. Kramer,et al.  Mean diffusivity in the amygdala correlates with anxiety in pediatric TBI , 2011, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[52]  Tricia L. Merkley,et al.  Chronic Aspects of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Review of the Literature. , 2015, Journal of neurotrauma.

[53]  Martijn P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks , 2013, NeuroImage.

[54]  C. Catsman-Berrevoets,et al.  The structural connectome of children with traumatic brain injury , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[55]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[56]  Weihong Yuan,et al.  Structural connectivity abnormality in children with acute mild traumatic brain injury using graph theoretical analysis , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Bruce S. McEwen,et al.  Recognizing resilience: Learning from the effects of stress on the brain , 2014, Neurobiology of Stress.

[58]  W. Haddon,et al.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. , 1974, The Journal of trauma.

[59]  D. Drotar,et al.  Predicting Longitudinal Patterns of Functional Deficits in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury Many Studies Have Found Evidence of Deterioration in Behavioral Adjust- Ment across Time and Persistent Postinjury Behavior Problems In , 2022 .

[60]  B. Leventhal,et al.  Relationship of trauma symptoms to amygdala-based functional brain changes in adolescents. , 2013, Journal of traumatic stress.

[61]  Joan Kaufman,et al.  Neurostructural imaging findings in children with post‐traumatic stress disorder: Brief review , 2009, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[62]  Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos,et al.  An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging , 2016, NeuroImage.

[63]  Ana C. Vasquez,et al.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Cingulum Bundle in Children After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2010, Developmental neuropsychology.

[64]  Conor Sheridan,et al.  Severe traumatic brain injury. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[65]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[66]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Permutation inference for the general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[67]  Bumseok Jeong,et al.  Reduced fractional anisotropy in the visual limbic pathway of young adults witnessing domestic violence in childhood , 2012, NeuroImage.

[68]  Joseph Biederman,et al.  Influence of gender on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children referred to a psychiatric clinic. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[69]  D. Parker,et al.  Altered brain network integrity after childhood maltreatment: A structural connectomic DTI‐study , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[70]  A. Reiss,et al.  Stress Predicts Brain Changes in Children: A Pilot Longitudinal Study on Youth Stress, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and the Hippocampus , 2007, Pediatrics.

[71]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks. , 2013, NeuroImage.

[72]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Accelerating Fibre Orientation Estimation from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using GPUs , 2012, 2012 20th Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing.

[73]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  K. Caeyenberghs,et al.  Structural brain connectivity and the sit-to-stand-to-sit performance in individuals with non-specific low back pain: A diffusion MRI based network analysis , 2016 .

[75]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Brain connectivity and postural control in young traumatic brain injury patients: A diffusion MRI based network analysis☆☆☆ , 2012, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[77]  L Nyström,et al.  Statistical Analysis , 2008, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[78]  C. Malpas,et al.  Recovery of White Matter following Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Depends on Injury Severity. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[79]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Development of brain structural connectivity between ages 12 and 30: A 4-Tesla diffusion imaging study in 439 adolescents and adults , 2013, NeuroImage.

[80]  S. Hearps,et al.  White matter microstructure predicts longitudinal social cognitive outcomes after paediatric traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study , 2017, Psychological Medicine.

[81]  David Bonekamp,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging in children and adolescents: Reproducibility, hemispheric, and age-related differences , 2007, NeuroImage.

[82]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  A Bayesian framework for global tractography , 2007, NeuroImage.

[83]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[84]  Bumseok Jeong,et al.  Preliminary Evidence for White Matter Tract Abnormalities in Young Adults Exposed to Parental Verbal Abuse , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[85]  O. Sporns,et al.  White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  A. Petersen,et al.  A self-report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity, and initial norms , 1988, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[87]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Developmental stages and sex differences of white matter and behavioral development through adolescence: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[88]  E. Shirtcliff,et al.  Concurrent and longitudinal associations of basal and diurnal cortisol with mental health symptoms in early adolescence. , 2008, Developmental psychobiology.

[89]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Longitudinal Mapping of Cortical Thickness and Brain Growth in Normal Children , 2022 .

[90]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.