Non-stationary blind deconvolution of medical ultrasound scans

In linear approximation, the formation of a radio-frequency (RF) ultrasound image can be described based on a standard convolution model in which the image is obtained as a result of convolution of the point spread function (PSF) of the ultrasound scanner in use with a tissue reflectivity function (TRF). Due to the band-limited nature of the PSF, the RF images can only be acquired at a finite spatial resolution, which is often insufficient for proper representation of the diagnostic information contained in the TRF. One particular way to alleviate this problem is by means of image deconvolution, which is usually performed in a “blind” mode, when both PSF and TRF are estimated at the same time. Despite its proven effectiveness, blind deconvolution (BD) still suffers from a number of drawbacks, chief among which stems from its dependence on a stationary convolution model, which is incapable of accounting for the spatial variability of the PSF. As a result, virtually all existing BD algorithms are applied to localized segments of RF images. In this work, we introduce a novel method for non-stationary BD, which is capable of recovering the TRF concurrently with the spatially variable PSF. Particularly, our approach is based on semigroup theory which allows one to describe the effect of such a PSF in terms of the action of a properly defined linear semigroup. The approach leads to a tractable optimization problem, which can be solved using standard numerical methods. The effectiveness of the proposed solution is supported by experiments with in vivo ultrasound data.

[1]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  Adaptive learning of tissue reflectivity statistics and its application to deconvolution of medical ultrasound scans , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[2]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Understanding Blind Deconvolution Algorithms , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  S. Hahn Hilbert Transforms in Signal Processing , 1996 .

[4]  Hyunjoong Kim,et al.  Functional Analysis I , 2017 .

[5]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  Blind Deconvolution of Medical Ultrasound Images: A Parametric Inverse Filtering Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Cishen Zhang,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to ultrasound imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[7]  K. Wear Ultrasonic attenuation in human calcaneus from 0.2 to 1.7 MHz , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  J. Benedetto Harmonic Analysis and Applications , 2020 .

[9]  Adrian Basarab,et al.  Ultrasound compressive deconvolution with ℓP-Norm prior , 2015, 2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[10]  J A Jensen,et al.  Deconvolution of in-vivo ultrasound B-mode images. , 1993, Ultrasonic imaging.

[11]  J. Goldstein Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications , 1985 .

[12]  Oleg V. Michailovich,et al.  A novel approach to the 2-D blind deconvolution problem in medical ultrasound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Thaddeus Wilson,et al.  Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation 3rd Edition, by Wayne R. Hedrick, David L. Hykes, and Dale E. Starchman , 1995 .

[14]  Stéphanie Bidon,et al.  Semi-blind deconvolution for resolution enhancement in ultrasound imaging , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[15]  Stephen A. Dyer,et al.  Digital signal processing , 2018, 8th International Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004..

[16]  T. Case,et al.  Ultrasound physics and instrumentation. , 1998, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[17]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[18]  Peter J. Huber,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[19]  Joachim Weickert Nonlinear Diffusion Scale-Spaces , 1997, Gaussian Scale-Space Theory.

[20]  A. Einstein Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen [AdP 17, 549 (1905)] , 2005, Annalen der Physik.

[21]  T. Taxt,et al.  Restoration of medical ultrasound images using two-dimensional homomorphic deconvolution , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  A. Petropulu,et al.  Higher order spectra based deconvolution of ultrasound images , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[25]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  An EM algorithm for wavelet-based image restoration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2001 .

[27]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[28]  H Gomersall,et al.  Efficient implementation of spatially-varying 3-D ultrasound deconvolution , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.