Optimal Dose of Succinylcholine Revisited

Background The authors reappraised the conventional wisdom that the intubating dose of succinylcholine must be 1.0 mg/kg and attempted to define the lower range of succinylcholine doses that provide acceptable intubation conditions in 95% of patients within 60 s. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind study involved 200 patients. Anesthesia was induced with 2 &mgr;g/kg fentanyl and 2 mg/kg propofol. After loss of consciousness, patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine or saline (control group). Tracheal intubation was performed 60 s later. A blinded investigator performed all laryngoscopies and also graded intubating conditions. Results Intubating conditions were acceptable (excellent plus good grade combined) in 30%, 92%, 94%, and 98% of patients after 0.0, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine, respectively. The incidence of acceptable intubating conditions was significantly greater (P < 0.05) in patients receiving succinylcholine compared with those in the control group but was not different among the different succinylcholine dose groups. The calculated doses of succinylcholine (and their 95% confidence intervals) that were required to achieve acceptable intubating conditions in 90% and 95% of patients at 60 s were 0.24 (0.19–0.31) mg/kg and 0.56 (0.43–0.73) mg/kg, respectively. Conclusions The use of 1.0 mg/kg of succinylcholine may be excessive if the goal is to achieve acceptable intubating conditions within 60 s. Comparable intubating conditions were achieved after 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg succinylcholine. In a rapid-sequence induction, 95% of patients with normal airway anatomy anesthetized with 2 &mgr;g/kg fentanyl and 2 mg/kg propofol should have acceptable intubating conditions at 60 s after 0.56 mg/kg succinylcholine. Reducing the dose of succinylcholine should allow a more rapid return of spontaneous respiration and airway reflexes.

[1]  F. Donati Tracheal intubation: unconsciousness, analgesia and muscle relaxation , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[2]  A. Kopman,et al.  Reexamined: The Recommended Endotracheal Intubating Dose for Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blockers of Rapid Onset , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  R. Mirakhur,et al.  Frequency of haemoglobin desaturation with the use of succinylcholine during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia , 2001, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  T. Heier,et al.  Hemoglobin Desaturation after Succinylcholine-induced Apnea: A Study of the Recovery of Spontaneous Ventilation in Healthy Volunteers , 2001, Anesthesiology.

[5]  A. Iamaroon,et al.  Endotracheal Intubation with Thiopental/Succinylcholine or Sevoflurane-Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia in Adults: A Comparative Study , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  B. Debaene,et al.  Rapacuronium 2.0 or 2.5 mg kg-1 for rapid-sequence induction: comparison with succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg-1. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  A. Hiller,et al.  Tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia in children with propofol — remifentanil or propofol-rocuronium , 2000, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[8]  A. Kopman,et al.  An Alternate Method for Estimating the Dose-Response Relationships of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs , 2000, Anesthesia and Analgesia.

[9]  V. Slavov,et al.  Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: an electromyographic study in humans. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[10]  M. Blobner,et al.  Comparison of intubating conditions after rapacuronium (Org 9487) and succinylcholine following rapid sequence induction in adult patients. , 1999, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  A. Kopman,et al.  Molar potency is predictive of the speed of onset of neuromuscular block for agents of intermediate, short, and ultrashort duration. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[12]  K. Olkkola,et al.  A large simple randomized trial of rocuronium versus succinylcholine in rapid‐sequence induction of anaesthesia along with propofol , 1999, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[13]  K. Olkkola,et al.  Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for use during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia , 1998, Anaesthesia.

[14]  H. H. Ali,et al.  A Comparison of the Intubation Conditions between Mivacurium and Rocuronium during Balanced Anesthesia , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[15]  J. Stevens,et al.  Tracheal Intubation in Ambulatory Surgery Patients: Using Remifentanil and Propofol Without Muscle Relaxants , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  J. Benumof,et al.  Critical Hemoglobin Desaturation Will Occur before Return to an Unparalyzed State following 1 mg/kg Intravenous Succinylcholine , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[17]  R. Matteo,et al.  Dose-Ranging Study in Younger Adult and Elderly Patients of ORG 9487, a New, Rapid-Onset, Short-Duration Muscle Relaxant , 1997, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[18]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents , 1996, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  F. Donati,et al.  Onset of Maximum Neuromuscular Block Following Succinylcholine or Vecuronium in Four Age Groups , 1993, Anesthesiology.

[20]  M. Zornow,et al.  Tracheal Intubation Without the Use of Muscle Relaxants: A Technique Using Propofol and Varying Doses of Alfentanil , 1992, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[21]  J. van Egmond,et al.  Factors affecting magnitude and time course of neuromuscular block produced by suxamethonium. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  P. Hopkins,et al.  Comparison of high and low doses of suxamethonium , 1991, Anaesthesia.

[23]  C. Meistelman,et al.  Neuromuscular Effects of Succinylcholine on the Vocal Cords and Adductor Pollicis Muscles , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  D. Silverman,et al.  OPTIMIZING POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA WITH A RAPIDLY ACTING EPIDURAL NARCOTICRESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLINDED STUDY , 1988 .

[25]  Charles E. Smith,et al.  Potency of Succinylcholine at the Diaphragm and at the Adductor Pollicis Muscle , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  R. Sebaldt Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations with Computer Programs. Second Edition , 1988 .

[27]  F. Donati,et al.  Dose—response Curves for Succinylcholine: Single Versus Cumulative Techniques , 1987, Anesthesiology.

[28]  D. Thys,et al.  2 DIMENSIONAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY CAN IMPROVE MYOCARDIAL PRESERVATION BY CARDIOPLEGIC ARREST , 1984 .

[29]  R. Tallarida,et al.  Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations: With Computer Programs , 1984 .

[30]  A. Kopman,et al.  Milliamperage requirements for supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve with surface electrodes. , 1984, Anesthesiology.

[31]  J. Ryan,et al.  The neuromuscular effects of suxamethonium in man. , 1970, British journal of anaesthesia.

[32]  J. Dillon,et al.  Clinical Studies on Succinylcholine Chloride , 1967, Anesthesiology.

[33]  S. Nimmo,et al.  Effectiveness and sequelae of very low-dose suxamethonium for nasal intubation. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[34]  David S. Smith Medical Malpractice, A Preventive Approach , 1988 .