Rejecting Others' Influence: Negative Sentiment and Status in Task Groups

Sentiment has been shown to affect status processes, but the mechanism is unclear. This article presents evidence in support of one of two competing approaches—sentiments as constituent elements of expectations or sentiments as moderators of expectations—that conceptualize the effect of interpersonal sentiments on status behaviors, as studied within the framework of expectations states theory. I create an experimental design, based on the standard experimental setting developed by expectations states theorists, to adjudicate between these two approaches. Subjects' levels of responsibility for team outcome and sentiment vary between the four experimental conditions, in accordance with the Camilleri and Berger model for decision making. Data reveal support for the “sentiment as moderator” model. I propose further directions for formalizing these findings.

[1]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1986 .

[2]  Robert Shelly How Performance Expectations Arise From Sentiments , 2001 .

[3]  Michael J. Lovaglia,et al.  Emotional Reactions and Status in Groups , 1996 .

[4]  B. Meeker,et al.  Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. , 1977, American sociological review.

[5]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[6]  H. Scheffé A METHOD FOR JUDGING ALL CONTRASTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE , 1953 .

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[9]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Working papers in the theory of action , 1981 .

[10]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. , 1993 .

[11]  A. Isen,et al.  Affect and Social Behavior. , 1991 .

[12]  J. Heiss Degree of intimacy and male-female interaction. , 1962 .

[13]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test* , 1992 .

[14]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Evaluations and the Formation of Expectations , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Robert K. Leik,et al.  Instrumentality and Emotionality in Family Interaction , 1963 .

[16]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  J. C. Moore Status and influence in small group interactions. , 1968, Sociometry.

[18]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  The Camilleri-Berger model revisited , 2001 .

[20]  J. Berger,et al.  Decision-Making and Social Influence: A Model and an Experimental Test , 1967 .

[21]  Murray Webster,et al.  How Formal Status, Liking, and Ability Status Structure Interaction: Three Theoretical Principles and a Test , 1997 .

[22]  M. Webster,et al.  Overview of status generalization. , 1988 .

[23]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation. , 1982 .

[24]  David R. Heise,et al.  Some methodological issues in semantic differential research. , 1969 .

[25]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  J. Berger Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach , 1976 .

[27]  L. Berkowitz Liking for the group and the perceived merit of the group's behavior. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  Thomas L. Conner,et al.  Decision-Making and Social Influence: A Revised Model and Further Experimental Evidence , 1976 .