Effects of Injection Timings and Intake Port Flow Control on the In-Cylinder Wetted Fuel Footprints during PFI Engine Startup Process

Wall-wetting due to liquid fuel film motion and fuel droplet impingement on combustion chamber walls is a major source of unburned hydrocarbons (UBHC), and is a concern for oil dilution in PFI engines. An experimental study was carried out to investigate the effects of injection timing, a charge motion control device, and the matching of injector with port geometry, on the "footprints" of liquid fuel inside the combustion chamber during the PFI engine staffing process. Using a gasoline-soluble dye and filter paper deployed on the cylinder liner and piston top land surfaces to capture the liquid fuel footprints, the effects of the mixture formation processes on the wetted footprints can be qualitatively and quantitatively examined by comparing the wetted footprint locations and their color intensities. Real-time filming of the development of wetted footprints using a high-speed camera can also show the time history of the fuel wetting process inside an optically accessible engine. The results show that the cold-start in-cylinder wetted footprint is quite engine specific, depending on the intake-port to injector matching. The tumble mixture-motion plate inserted in the intake port creates more turbulence and enhances mixing during the intake process, and therefore significantly reduces the wetted fuel footprint. Limited UBHC measurements were also performed on the engine to compare with the imaging results.

[1]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Contribution of Liquid Fuel to Hydrocarbon Emissions in Spark Ignition Engines , 2001 .

[2]  Edward J. Timm,et al.  The measurement and control of cyclic variations of flow in a piston cylinder assembly , 2003 .

[3]  Keiso Takeda,et al.  Mixture Preparation and HC Emissions of a 4-Valve Engine with Port Fuel Injection During Cold Starting and Warm-up , 1995 .

[4]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Liquid Fuel Transport Mechanisms into the Cylinder of a Firing Port-Injected SI Engine During Start Up , 1997 .

[5]  Yoshishige Ohyama,et al.  Mixture formation of fuel injection systems in gasoline engines , 1988 .

[6]  R. M. Green,et al.  LIF and Flame-Emission Imaging of Liquid Fuel Films and Pool Fires in an SI Engine During a Simulated Cold Start , 1997 .

[7]  Ming Chia Lai,et al.  Correlating Port Fuel injection to Wetted Fuel Footprints on Combustion Chamber Walls and UBHC in Engine Start Processes , 2003 .

[8]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Liquid Gasoline Behavior in the Engine Cylinder of a SI Engine , 1994 .

[9]  Eric Warren Curtis,et al.  The Effects of Injector Targeting and Fuel Volatility on Fuel Dynamics in a PFI Engine During Warm-up: Part II - Modeling Results , 1998 .

[10]  Ming Chia Lai,et al.  A Visualization Study of Liquid Fuel Distribution and Combustion Inside a Port-Injected Gasoline Engine Under Different Start Conditions , 2000 .

[11]  Makoto Kaneko,et al.  Tumble Generator Valve (TGV) Control of In-Cylinder Bulk Flow and Its Turbulence Near Spark Plug in SI Engine , 2001 .

[12]  Domenic A. Santavicca,et al.  Effects of Swirl and Tumble on Mixture Preparation During Cold Start of a Gasoline Direct-Injection Engine , 2000 .

[13]  David L. Harrington,et al.  The Spray Characteristics of Automotive Port Fuel Injection-A Critical Reviews , 1995 .