The Surveying and Representation Process Applied to Archaeology: A Quest for Invariants in a Highly Variable Context

The study and analysis of archaeological elements often swings from large sites to small objects. This variability in dimensions and typology actually determines an equal variability of problems encountered during the surveying and representation process so that it is hard to retrieve a reliable common theoretical and operational background able to guide the researcher through the various steps. The problems connected with the interpretation of data (and their lack of clarity) disturb in fact considerably the final goal of surveying: achieve the most profound knowledge of the object analyzed. Taking into consideration numerous survey campaigns carried out for years, this chapter seeks to present a modus operandi that seems to be indispensable for standardizing and regulating procedures of data collecting, elaborating and representing applied by our research team from the Department of History, Drawing and Restoration of Architecture (Sapienza—University of Rome), the aim being to make the final result scientific, i.e. more objective and correct. Together with a general methodological framing, we shall describe a number of research projects spanning from large sites (Petra), single buildings/architectural structures (The Temple of Divus Claudio, Rome) and small objects (Tombs and artifacts in Crustumerium – Rome).

[1]  Luciano Silva,et al.  A 3D reconstruction pipeline for digital preservation , 2009, CVPR.

[2]  Brian Leigh Molyneaux,et al.  The cultural life of images : visual representation in archaeology , 1998 .

[3]  François Blais Review of 20 years of range sensor development , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Luca J. Senatore,et al.  From surveying to representation theoretical background, practical issues, possible guidelines , 2012, 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia.

[5]  Marco Gaiani,et al.  Teorie per rappresentare e comunicare i siti archeologici attraverso modelli critici , 2011 .

[6]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Optimized position sensors for flying-spot active triangulation systems , 2003, Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 2003. 3DIM 2003. Proceedings..

[7]  Filippo Stanco,et al.  Computer graphics solutions for dealing with colors in archaeology , 2012, CGIV.

[8]  M. Mattei Il rilievo architettonico , 2010 .

[9]  Matteo Dellepiane,et al.  An Experiment of Integrated Technologies in Digital Archaeology : Creation of New Pipelines to Increase the Perception of Archaeological Data , 2013 .

[10]  Bradley Cantrell,et al.  Digital Drawing for Landscape Architecture: Contemporary Techniques and Tools for Digital Representation in Site Design , 2010 .

[11]  F. Nex,et al.  Integration of TOF camera and multi-image matching approach for Cultural Heritage survey , 2010 .

[12]  P. Abrahams,et al.  Three-dimensional (3D) visualisation: the application of terrestrial laser scanning in the investigation of historical Scottish farming townships , 2009 .

[13]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  Detailed 3D Modelling of Castles , 2007 .