A field-based investigation to examine underwater soundscapes of five common river habitats

Aquatic river habitat types have been characterized and classified for over five decades based on hydrogeomorphic and ecological variables. However, few studies considered the generation of underwater sound as a unique property of aquatic habitats, and therefore as a potential information source for freshwater organisms. In this study, five common habitat types along 12 rivers in Switzerland (six replicates per habitat type) were acoustically compared. Acoustic signals were recorded by submerging two parallel hydrophones and were analysed by calculating the energetic mean as well as the temporal variance of ten octave bands (31·5 Hz–16 kHz). Concurrently, each habitat type was characterized by hydraulic and geomorphic variables, respectively. The average relative roughness, velocity-to-depth ratio, and Froude number explained most of the variance of the acoustic signals created in different habitat types. The average relative roughness predominantly affected middle frequencies (63 Hz–1 kHz), while streambed sediment transport increased high-frequency sound pressure levels (2–16 kHz) as well as the temporal variability of the recorded signal. Each aquatic habitat type exhibited a distinct acoustic signature or soundscape. These soundscapes may be a crucial information source for many freshwater organisms about their riverine environment. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins , 1997 .

[2]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  INTERCONTINENTAL CONVERGENCE OF STREAM FISH COMMUNITY TRAITS ALONG GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC GRADIENTS , 2002 .

[3]  G. Norton,et al.  On the relative role of sea-surface roughness and bubble plumes in shallow-water propagation in the low-kilohertz region , 2001 .

[4]  Thomas J. Carlson,et al.  Application of Sound and other Stimuli to Control Fish Behavior , 1998 .

[5]  R. Fay,et al.  Soundscapes and the sense of hearing of fishes. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[6]  M. Lehotský,et al.  Influence of morphohydraulic habitat structure on invertebrate communities (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) , 2008, Biologia.

[7]  M. P. Norton,et al.  Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration Analysis for Engineers , 1990 .

[8]  M L Lenhardt,et al.  Shallow-water propagation of the toadfish mating call. , 1983, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. A, Comparative physiology.

[9]  R. McCauley,et al.  Homeward Sound , 2005, Science.

[10]  Simon Williams,et al.  Hydraulic microhabitats and the distribution of macroinvertebrate assemblages in riffles , 2005 .

[11]  Andrea Megela Simmons,et al.  The Sense of Hearing in Fishes and Amphibians , 1999 .

[12]  D. Tonolla,et al.  A flume experiment to examine underwater sound generation by flowing water , 2009, Aquatic Sciences.

[13]  M. Fine,et al.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: ambient noise and short-range propagation in shallow streams. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  X. Lurton An Introduction to Underwater Acoustics , 2002 .

[15]  Philip M. Morse,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Sound Transmission , 1959 .

[16]  E. Wohl,et al.  Reach-scale channel geometry of mountain streams , 2008 .

[17]  Anthony D. Hawkins,et al.  The Hearing Abilities of Fish , 1981 .

[18]  M. Lugli,et al.  Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[19]  F. Ladich,et al.  Parallel Evolution in Fish Hearing Organs , 2004 .

[20]  R. McCauley,et al.  Directional orientation of pomacentrid larvae to ambient reef sound , 2004, Coral Reefs.

[21]  J. Beisel,et al.  Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics , 1998, Hydrobiologia.

[22]  F. Hauer,et al.  Flow competence and streambed stability: an evaluation of technique and application , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[23]  M. Fine,et al.  Stream ambient noise, spectrum and propagation of sounds in the goby Padogobius martensii: sound pressure and particle velocity. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[25]  M. Wolman A method of sampling coarse river‐bed material , 1954 .

[26]  D. Rickenmann,et al.  Continuous measurement of sediment transport in the Erlenbach stream using piezoelectric bedload impact sensors , 2007 .

[27]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[28]  Friedrich Ladich,et al.  Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats? , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Peter H. Rogers,et al.  Underwater Sound as a Biological Stimulus , 1988 .

[30]  L. E. Wysocki,et al.  Diversity in ambient noise in European freshwater habitats: noise levels, spectral profiles, and impact on fishes. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. Cato,et al.  Sound detection in situ by the larvae of a coral-reef damselfish (Pomacentridae) , 2002 .

[32]  R. McCauley,et al.  Settlement-stage coral reef fish prefer the higher-frequency invertebrate-generated audible component of reef noise , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Ambient sound as a cue for navigation by the pelagic larvae of reef fishes , 2000 .

[34]  D. Rickenmann,et al.  Calibration of piezoelectric bedload impact sensors in the Pitzbach mountain stream , 2008 .

[35]  J. Dusek,et al.  Fish assemblage structure, habitat and microhabitat preference of five fish species in a small stream , 2005 .

[36]  Christopher Platt,et al.  Sound Detection Mechanisms and Capabilities of Teleost Fishes , 2003 .