Integration of on-farm biodiesel production with anaerobic digestion to maximise energy yield and greenhouse gas savings from process and farm residues.

Anaerobic co-digestion of residues from the cold pressing and trans-esterification of oilseed rape (OSR) with other farm wastes was considered as a means of enhancing the sustainability of on-farm biodiesel production. The study verified the process energy yields using biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests and semi-continuous digestion trials. The results indicated that high proportions of OSR cake in the feedstock led to a decrease in volatile solids destruction and instability of the digestion process. Co-digestion with cattle slurry or with vegetable waste led to acceptable specific and volumetric methane productions, and a digestate low in potentially toxic elements (PTE). The results were used to evaluate energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions of the integrated process compared with biodiesel production alone. Co-digestion was shown to provide energy self-sufficiency and security of supply to farms, with sufficient surplus for export as fuel and electricity.

[1]  C. Burton.  Manure management: treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture , 1997 .

[2]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  Review of Energy Balances and Emissions Associated with Biomass-Based Transport Fuels Relevant to the United Kingdom Context , 2008 .

[3]  Matt Lobley,et al.  What is land for? : the food, fuel and climate change debate , 2009 .

[4]  L. Mcdowell.  Feeding minerals to cattle on pasture , 1996 .

[5]  I. Henderson,et al.  Effects of crop diversification and low pesticide inputs on bird populations on arable land , 2009 .

[6]  A. Murugesan,et al.  Production and analysis of bio-diesel from non-edible oils-A review , 2009 .

[7]  Havva Balat,et al.  A critical review of bio-diesel as a vehicular fuel. , 2008 .

[8]  V. Gunaseelan.  Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review , 1997 .

[9]  M. A. Elsayed,et al.  CARBON AND ENERGY BALANCES FOR A RANGE OF BIOFUELS OPTIONS , 2003 .

[10]  Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft Darmstadt.  Cooperation in livestock farming. A discussion from the KTBL. , 1980 .

[11]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants , 2004 .

[12]  Kerry R. Pearn,et al.  What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale agricultural land use, and what not? , 2006 .

[13]  A. M. Buswell,et al.  The Methane Fermentation of Carbohydrates1,2 , 1933 .

[14]  J. C. Converse,et al.  Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes , 1986 .

[15]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[16]  John Harris,et al.  Triacylglycerols in oilseed rape during seed development , 1983 .

[17]  Y. Clough,et al.  On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  T. A. Seadi,et al.  Utilisation of digeatate from biogas plants as biofertiliser , 2010 .

[19]  A Salter,et al.  Establishing an energy balance for crop-based digestion. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Sonia Heaven,et al.  Potential errors in the quantitative evaluation of biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[21]  G Lettinga,et al.  Kinetics and mass-transfer phenomena in anaerobic granular sludge. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.