Theorizing in Design Science Research

Theory is a central element in research. Due to the importance of theory in research, considerable efforts have been made to better understand the process of theorizing, i.e., development of a theory. A review of the literature in this area suggests that two dominant theorizing approaches are anchored to deductive and inductive reasoning respectively. In contrast, an essential part of theorizing for design may involve abductive reasoning. The purpose of design theory is not to advance declarative logic regarding truth or falseness, but to guide learning and problem solving through the conceptualization of a design artifact. This paper critically examines the process of theorizing for design by developing an idealized design theorizing framework. The framework indicates that theorizing for design operates in two distinct domains: instance and abstract. Further, four key theorizing activities are identified in this framework: abstraction, solution search, de-abstraction, and registration. The framework provides grounds for building strong design theories in the design science paradigm by explicating the underlying theorizing process for design.

[1]  R. Swinburne,et al.  The Philosophy of Karl Popper , 1975 .

[2]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[4]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDING , 2004 .

[6]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  A Theory-Driven Design Framework for Social Recommender Systems , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Stuart Anderson,et al.  Requirements Evolution from Process to Product Oriented Management , 2001, PROFES.

[8]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[9]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A design theory for managing software process improvement , 2009, DESRIST.

[10]  J. Dewey How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[11]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development , 2007 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  Correspondence Versus Autonomy In The Language Of Understanding Human Action , 1986 .

[13]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Building theory in the sciences of the artificial , 2009, DESRIST.

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  E. A. Locke The Case for Inductive Theory Building† , 2007 .

[17]  Robert Winter,et al.  Design science research in Europe , 2008 .

[18]  Zhiyong Wang Design and Management , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science.

[19]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  The Design Theory Nexus , 2008, MIS Q..

[20]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology , 2009 .

[21]  Wei Pan,et al.  The Philosophical Foundations of Prescriptive Statements and Statistical Inference , 2011 .

[22]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[23]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[24]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[25]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Explanatory Design Theory , 2010, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[26]  David Lorge Parnas,et al.  A Rational Design Process: How and Why to Fake It , 1985, TAPSOFT, Vol.2.

[27]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Criteria of progress for information systems design theories , 2011, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[28]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Paul Hoyningen-Huene,et al.  Context of discovery and context of justification , 1987 .

[32]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Artifact as theory-nexus: hermeneutics meets theory-based design , 1989, CHI '89.

[33]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Evaluating the adoption potential of design science efforts: The case of APSARA , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Paul Guyer,et al.  Critique of the Power of Judgment , 2000 .

[36]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[38]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[39]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[40]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[41]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[42]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[44]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Process Grammar as a Tool for Business Process Design , 2008, MIS Q..

[45]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Design Research : Synergies from Interdisciplinary Perspectives , 2010 .

[46]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani An Interview with P. K. C. Bose Managing Director Southern Electromechanical Works (SEW) EURODRIVE INDIA , 2004 .

[47]  Stanley Goldberg,et al.  Discovering: Inventing and Solving Problems at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge , 1997 .

[48]  D. Isenberg Thinking and Managing: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Managerial Problem Solving , 1986 .

[49]  K. Weick What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[50]  R. Faris,et al.  Handbook of modern sociology , 1965 .

[51]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[52]  Ivan Aaen,et al.  Essence: facilitating software innovation , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Towards an Information Systems Design Research Framework: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2006 .

[54]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[55]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[56]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[57]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[58]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[59]  Murray S. Davis,et al.  That's Interesting! , 1971 .

[60]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Design and Management , 2010 .

[61]  John R. Venable,et al.  Identifying and Addressing Stakeholder Interests in Design Science Research: An Analysis Using Critical Systems Heuristics , 2009, CreativeSME.

[62]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A Framework for Selecting Change Strategies in IT Organizations , 2006, PROFES.

[63]  James W. McAllister,et al.  The Evidential Significance of Thought Experiment in Science , 1996 .

[64]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[65]  H. Reichenbach Experience and Prediction. An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge , 1938 .

[66]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[67]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Forms of Reasoning in the Design Science Research Process , 2011, DESRIST.

[68]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Relations Between Situational Factors and the Comparative Referents Used by Employees , 1986 .

[69]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Design Theory in Information Systems , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  S. Cassels Design in business , 1990 .

[71]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[72]  J. Dewey Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[73]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[74]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[75]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .