OBJECTIVE
To determine effects of intraincisional bioactive glass on healing of sutured skin wounds in dogs.
ANIMALS
9 purpose-bred mature female Beagles.
PROCEDURE
3 small matched bilateral (treated vs control) full-thickness truncal skin incisions were made and sutured. Treated wounds received intraincisional particulate bioactive glass prior to closure. Laser Doppler perfusion imaging was used to assess percentage change in tissue perfusion 3 and 5 days after incision on 1 set of 2 matched wounds, and skin and subcutaneous tissue-cutaneous trunci breaking strength were assessed at 5 days. The other 2 sets of wounds were used for histologic evaluation at 5 and 21 days, respectively.
RESULTS
Subjective signs of gross inflammatory reaction were not detected in treated or control wounds. At 5 days, median subcutaneous tissue-cutaneous trunci breaking strength was significantly higher in treated wounds than in control wounds-(188.75 vs 75.00 g). At 5 days, median scores were significantly higher for neutrophils (1 vs 0), macrophages (2 vs 1), and necrosis (1 vs 0) for treated wounds than for control wounds. At 21 days, median macrophage scores were significantly higher for treated wounds than for control wounds (2 vs 1).
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Bioactive glass in soft tissues does not cause a gross inflammatory reaction but causes an increase in histologic signs of inflammation, which decreases with time. Bioactive glass has potential for increasing tissue strength. Increased subcutaneous breaking strength could be beneficial in treating wounds in which early healing strength is needed.
[1]
L L Hench,et al.
Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass-ceramic materials to bone and muscle.
,
1973,
Journal of biomedical materials research.
[2]
Y. Izumi,et al.
Calcium and silicon from bioactive glass concerned with formation of nodules in periodontal-ligament fibroblasts in vitro.
,
1997,
Journal of oral rehabilitation.
[3]
M. Woodhead,et al.
Effect of locally injected medications on healing of pad wounds in dogs.
,
1996,
American journal of veterinary research.
[4]
L. Hench,et al.
CRC handbook of bioactive ceramics
,
1990
.
[5]
L L Hench,et al.
Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses.
,
1981,
Journal of biomedical materials research.
[6]
E. Stelnicki,et al.
Plastic surgery's plastics.
,
1996,
Clinics in plastic surgery.
[7]
M. Adam,et al.
Reactivity and the fate of some composite bioimplants based on collagen in connective tissue.
,
1995,
Biomaterials.