The correlation between citation-based and expert-based assessments of publication channels: SNIP and SJR vs. Norwegian quality assessments

[1]  Erjia Yan,et al.  Predicting and recommending collaborations: An author-, institution-, and country-level analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  P. Ahlgren.  The SNIP indicator in relation to the Norwegian model , 2014 .

[4]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  PageRank-Related Methods for Analyzing Citation Networks , 2014 .

[5]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[7]  Éric Archambault,et al.  Towards a Multilingual, Comprehensive and Open Scientific Journal Ontology , 2013 .

[8]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison , 2012, Scientometrics.

[9]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Redefining the field of economics: Improving field normalization for the application of bibliometric techniques in the field of economics , 2012 .

[10]  Olle Persson,et al.  Field normalized citation rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds , 2012, Scientometrics.

[11]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A further step forward in measuring journals' scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Linda Butler.  The devil is in the detail: Concerns about Vanclay's analysis of Australian journal rankings , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[13]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[14]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A priori vs. a posteriori normalisation of citation indicators. The case of journal ranking , 2011, Scientometrics.

[15]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  An evaluation of the Australian Research Council's journal ranking , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[16]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  of Science , 2022 .

[17]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[18]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Citing-side normalization of journal impact: A robust variant of the Audience Factor , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[20]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[21]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[22]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[23]  J. Schneider.  An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway , 2009 .

[24]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Hans-Dieter Daniel,et al.  A new reference standard for citation analysis in chemistry and related fields based on the sections of Chemical Abstracts , 2009, Scientometrics.

[26]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  Calibrating the zoom — a test of Zitt’s hypothesis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[27]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[28]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[29]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.

[30]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises , 1996, Scientometrics.

[31]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[32]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  United Germany: The new scientific superpower? , 1990, Scientometrics.

[33]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .