Assessing the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross-validation.

Structure determination of macromolecules in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involves the fitting of atomic models to the observed nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data. Complete cross-validation has been used to define reliable and unbiased criteria for the quality of solution NMR structures. The method is based on the partitioning of NOE data into test sets and the cross-validation of statistical quantities for each of the test sets. A high correlation between cross-validated measures of fit, such as distance bound violations and NMR R values, and the quality of solution NMR structures was observed. Less complete data resulted in poorer satisfaction of the cross-validated measures of fit. Optimization of cross-validated measures of fit will likely produce solution NMR structures with maximal information content.

[1]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR. , 1994, Science.

[2]  D. S. Garrett,et al.  Three-dimensional solution structure of human interleukin-4 by multidimensional heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1993, Science.

[3]  G M Clore,et al.  Exploring the limits of precision and accuracy of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1993, Science.

[5]  Y. Thériault,et al.  Solution structure of the cyclosporin A/cyclophilin complex by NMR , 1993, Nature.

[6]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  High-resolution three-dimensional structure of interleukin 1 beta in solution by three- and four-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[7]  R A Smith,et al.  Human interleukin 4. The solution structure of a four-helix bundle protein. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. Nilges,et al.  NMR analysis of helix I from the 5S RNA of Escherichia coli. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[9]  A. Brunger.  Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. , 1992 .

[10]  T. James.  Relaxation matrix analysis of two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra , 1991 .

[11]  I D Kuntz,et al.  Effects of limited input distance constraints upon the distance geometry algorithm , 1991, Biopolymers.

[12]  R. Huber,et al.  Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement , 1991 .

[13]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Structures of larger proteins in solution: three- and four-dimensional heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. , 1991, Science.

[14]  A T Brünger,et al.  Relaxation matrix refinement of the solution structure of squash trypsin inhibitor. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  P. Thomas,et al.  Protein solution structure determination using distances from two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect experiments: effect of approximations on the accuracy of derived structures. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J Otlewski,et al.  Determination of the complete three-dimensional structure of the trypsin inhibitor from squash seeds in aqueous solution by nuclear magnetic resonance and a combination of distance geometry and dynamical simulated annealing. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Ping F. Yip.  Calculating NOESY intensities by perturbation expansion , 1989 .

[19]  W. F. Gunsteren,et al.  Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations , 1989 .

[20]  Bradley Efron,et al.  Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistical Regression , 1988 .

[21]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by hybrid distance geometry‐dynamical simulated annealing calculations , 1988, FEBS letters.

[22]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  An evaluation of the combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry for the determination of protein conformations in solution. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  Timothy F. Havel,et al.  Solution conformation of proteinase inhibitor IIA from bull seminal plasma by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Pseudo-structures for the 20 common amino acids for use in studies of protein conformations by measurements of intramolecular proton-proton distance constraints with nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  A T Brünger,et al.  Sampling and efficiency of metric matrix distance geometry: A novel partial metrization algorithm , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[26]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  Two-, three-, and four-dimensional NMR methods for obtaining larger and more precise three-dimensional structures of proteins in solution. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[27]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  Simulated Annealing in Crystallography , 1991 .

[28]  W. Hendrickson.  Stereochemically restrained refinement of macromolecular structures. , 1985, Methods in enzymology.