Sensitivity of the pendulum test for assessing spasticity in persons with cerebral palsy

The sensitivity of the pendulum test to variation in spasticity in persons with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) was tested in 30 participants with CP and 10 participants without CP (controls) (mean age 13.8 years). The participants with CP were classified into three groups, with normal (mean age 15.9 years), mild/moderate (13.0 years), or severe (23.0 years) muscle tone, as assessed clinically using a modified Ashworth scale. Joint motion during the pendulum test was measured with an electrogoniometer. Muscle relaxation was confirmed using surface EMG. Outcome measures from the pendulum test were (1) number of oscillations, (2) duration of oscillations, (3) excursion of the first backward swing, and (4) relaxation index (first swing excursion/difference between the starting and resting angles). Data were assessed using one‐way analysis of variance. Outcome measures 1 to 3 differed significantly between control participants and participants with CP (p<0.05). The first swing excursion was the best predictor of the degree of spasticity in persons with CP, being significantly different between all groups (p<0.05). The number of oscillations and their duration differentiated between control participants and all participants with CP (p<0.05) but not between participants with CP who had mild/moderate versus severe spasticity (p>0.05). The relaxation index was not a sensitive measure (p>0.05 between most study groups). We conclude that the pendulum test is a valid tool for assessing spasticity in persons with CP and that the first swing excursion is the most sensitive outcome measure.

[1]  R. Penn,et al.  The effects of intrathecally administered baclofen on function in patients with spasticity. , 1995, Physical therapy.

[2]  C J Robinson,et al.  Spasticity in spinal cord injured patients: 1. Short-term effects of surface electrical stimulation. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Mumenthaler,et al.  Modified pendulousness test to assess tonus of thigh muscles in spasticity , 1958, Neurology.

[4]  R WARTENBERG,et al.  Pendulousness of the Legs as a Diagnostic Test , 1951, Neurology.

[5]  J-P. Lin,et al.  PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL MECHANISMS OF HINDFOOT EQUINUS IN CHILDHOOD HEMIPLEGIA , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[6]  T Bajd,et al.  Testing and modelling of spasticity. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[7]  M. B. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of treatment protocols on minimal to moderate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Mcmurdo,et al.  Does the Wartenberg pendulum test differentiate quantitatively between spasticity and rigidity? A study in elderly stroke and Parkinsonian patients. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  V. Dietz,et al.  Pathophysiology of gait in children with cerebral palsy. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Bajd,et al.  Pendulum testing of spasticity. , 1984, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  C. T. Leonard,et al.  Motor Behavior and Neural Changes following Perinatal and Adult-onse T Brain Damage: Implications for Therapeutic Interventions , 2022 .

[12]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[13]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Variability and reliability of the pendulum test for spasticity using a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[14]  A. L. Albright,et al.  Intrathecal baclofen for spasticity in cerebral palsy. , 1991, JAMA.

[15]  A. W. Smith,et al.  Clinical measurement of spasticity using the pendulum test: comparison of electrogoniometric and videotape analyses. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  H. MacPhail,et al.  EFFECT OF ISOKINETIC STRENGTH‐TRAINING ON FUNCTIONAL ABILITY AND WALKING EFFICIENCY IN ADOLESCENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  B. Ashworth PRELIMINARY TRIAL OF CARISOPRODOL IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. , 1964, The Practitioner.

[18]  R A Brown,et al.  Observations on the applicability of the Wartenberg pendulum test to healthy, elderly subjects. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer for the documentation of spasticity. Suggestion from the field. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[20]  Jean-Pierre Lin,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SPASTICITY IN HEMIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY I: PROXIMAL LOWER‐LIMB REFLEX EXCITABILITY , 1994, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[21]  Jean-Pierre Lin,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SPASTICITY IN HEMIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY. II: DISTAL LOWER‐LIMB REFLEX EXCITABILITY AND FUNCTION , 1994, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[22]  J Quintern,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of gait in spasticity and rigidity. Evidence that altered mechanical properties of muscle contribute to hypertonia. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  B. Myklebust A review of myotatic reflexes and the development of motor control and gait in infants and children: a special communication. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[24]  P. Grimaud [Cerebral palsy]. , 1972, Pediatrie.

[25]  V. Dietz,et al.  Normal and impaired regulation of muscle stiffness in gait: A new hypothesis about muscle hypertonia , 1983, Experimental Neurology.