Size-related scaling of tree form and function in a mixed-age forest

Summary Many morphological, physiological and ecological traits of trees scale with diameter, shaping the structure and function of forest ecosystems. Understanding the mechanistic basis for such scaling relationships is key to understanding forests globally and their role in Earth's changing climate system. Here, we evaluate theoretical predictions for the scaling of nine variables in a mixed-age temperate deciduous forest (CTFS-ForestGEO forest dynamics plot at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Virginia, USA) and compare observed scaling parameters to those from other forests world-wide. We examine fifteen species and various environmental conditions. Structural, physiological and ecological traits of trees scaled with stem diameter in a manner that was sometimes consistent with existing theoretical predictions – more commonly with those predicting a range of scaling values than a single universal scaling value. Scaling relationships were variable among species, reflecting substantive ecological differences. Scaling relationships varied considerably with environmental conditions. For instance, the scaling of sap flux density varied with atmospheric moisture demand, and herbivore browsing dramatically influenced stem abundance scaling. Thus, stand-level, time-averaged scaling relationships (e.g., the scaling of diameter growth) are underlain by a diversity of species-level scaling relationships that can vary substantially with fluctuating environmental conditions. In order to use scaling theory to accurately characterize forest ecosystems and predict their responses to global change, it will be critical to develop a more nuanced understanding of both the forces that constrain stand-level scaling and the complexity of scaling variation across species and environmental conditions.

[1]  T. McMahon,et al.  Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Hydraulic limitation of tree height: a critique , 2000 .

[3]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .

[4]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  Effects of Twenty Years of Deer Exclusion on Woody Vegetation at Three Life-History Stages in a Mid-Atlantic Temperate Deciduous Forest , 2013 .

[5]  A. Granier,et al.  A new method of sap flow measurement in tree stems , 1985 .

[6]  D. A. King,et al.  What controls tropical forest architecture: testing environmental, structural and floristic drivers , 2012 .

[7]  S. Naidu,et al.  Contrasting patterns of biomass allocation in dominant and suppressed loblolly pine , 1998 .

[8]  P. Klinkhamer.  Plant allometry: The scaling of form and process , 1995 .

[9]  Richard Condit,et al.  Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and a Comparison with Other Plots , 1998 .

[10]  B. Duval,et al.  Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate , 2013, Global change biology.

[11]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[12]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Controls over aboveground forest carbon density on Barro Colorado Island, Panama , 2010 .

[13]  James H Brown,et al.  Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Partitioning of soil water among canopy trees in a seasonally dry tropical forest , 1999, Oecologia.

[15]  John Tenhunen,et al.  The effect of tree height on crown level stomatal conductance , 2000 .

[16]  S. Andelman,et al.  Drought-mortality relationships for tropical forests. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[17]  D. Coomes,et al.  A general integrative framework for modelling woody biomass production and carbon sequestration rates in forests , 2012 .

[18]  George W. Koch,et al.  The limits to tree height , 2004, Nature.

[19]  M. Ayres,et al.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. , 2008, Ecology.

[21]  S. Davies.  TREE MORTALITY AND GROWTH IN 11 SYMPATRIC MACARANGA SPECIES IN BORNEO , 2001 .

[22]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Whole-tree water transport scales with sapwood capacitance in tropical forest canopy trees , 2003 .

[23]  James H. Brown,et al.  A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems , 1999, Nature.

[24]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Testing the Metabolic Scaling Theory of tree growth , 2009 .

[25]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Disturbances prevent stem size‐density distributions in natural forests from following scaling relationships , 2003 .

[26]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Osvaldo M. R. Cabral,et al.  Stomatal and boundary-layer conductances in an Amazonian terra firme rain forest. , 1990 .

[28]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Crown ratio influences allometric scaling in trees. , 2006, Ecology.

[29]  Frederick C Meinzer,et al.  Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: scaling from tissues to trees. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[30]  Brian J Enquist,et al.  Deviation from symmetrically self-similar branching in trees predicts altered hydraulics, mechanics, light interception and metabolic scaling. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[31]  D. Coomes,et al.  Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition , 2012 .

[32]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Testing the metabolic theory of ecology. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[33]  D. Coomes,et al.  Challenges to the generality of WBE theory. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  A. Maritan,et al.  An allometry-based approach for understanding forest structure, predicting tree-size distribution and assessing the degree of disturbance , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  F. Rovero,et al.  Large trees drive forest aboveground biomass variation in moist lowland forests across the tropics , 2013 .

[36]  R. Benyon,et al.  Relationships between stem diameter, sapwood area, leaf area and transpiration in a young mountain ash forest. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[37]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Transpiration from a multi-species deciduous forest as estimated by xylem sap flow techniques , 2001 .

[38]  Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al.  Growth and hydraulic (not mechanical) constraints govern the scaling of tree height and mass. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  O. Phillips,et al.  An international network to monitor the structure, composition and dynamics of Amazonian forests (RAINFOR) , 2002 .

[40]  Joshua S Weitz,et al.  Evaluating scaling models in biology using hierarchical Bayesian approaches , 2009, Ecology letters.

[41]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Differences in leaf phenology between juvenile and adult trees in a temperate deciduous forest. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[42]  G Goldstein,et al.  Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: do universal rules apply? , 2001, Tree physiology.

[43]  Alexis Achim,et al.  Wind loading of trees: influence of tree size and competition , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  Maurizio Mencuccini.  Hydraulic constraints in the functional scaling of trees. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[45]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Relationships Between Tree Height and Carbon Isotope Discrimination , 2011 .

[46]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Architecture of 54 moist-forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. , 2006, Ecology.

[47]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  Initial census, woody seedling, seed rain, and stand structure data for the SCBI SIGEO Large Forest Dynamics Plot , 2013 .

[48]  Lisa Patrick Bentley,et al.  A species‐level model for metabolic scaling in trees I. Exploring boundaries to scaling space within and across species , 2012 .

[49]  R. Condit,et al.  Testing metabolic theory with models of tree growth that include light competition , 2012 .

[50]  S. Pacala,et al.  Predictive Models of Forest Dynamics , 2008, Science.

[51]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Hydraulic Limits to Tree Height and Tree Growth , 1997 .

[52]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  CTFS‐ForestGEO: a worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change , 2015, Global change biology.

[53]  D. Coomes,et al.  A general combined model to describe tree-diameter distributions within subtropical and temperate forest communities , 2013 .

[54]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory , 2012, Oecologia.

[55]  A. Granier.  Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres , 1985 .

[56]  James H. Brown,et al.  The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. , 1999, Science.

[57]  James H. Brown,et al.  Metabolic ecology : a scaling approach , 2012 .

[58]  Filippo Simini,et al.  Self-similarity and scaling in forest communities , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Mortality and tree‐size distributions in natural mixed‐age forests , 2007 .

[60]  J. Sperry,et al.  Safety and efficiency conflicts in hydraulic architecture: Scaling from tissues to trees (Plant, Cell and Environment (2008) 31, (632-645)) , 2008 .

[61]  Sharon W. Woudenberg,et al.  The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database Description and Users Manual Version 4.0 for Phase 2 , 2012 .

[62]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Variability in radial sap flux density patterns and sapwood area among seven co-occurring temperate broad-leaved tree species. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[63]  Stephanie A. Bohlman,et al.  Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[64]  D. Coomes,et al.  Moving on from Metabolic Scaling Theory: hierarchical models of tree growth and asymmetric competition for light , 2011 .

[65]  David Kenfack,et al.  Comparing tropical forest tree size distributions with the predictions of metabolic ecology and equilibrium models. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[66]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[67]  D D Smith,et al.  Hydraulic trade-offs and space filling enable better predictions of vascular structure and function in plants , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.