Developments in greenhouse gas emissions and net energy use in Danish agriculture - how to achieve substantial CO(2) reductions?

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture are a significant contributor to total Danish emissions. Consequently, much effort is currently given to the exploration of potential strategies to reduce agricultural emissions. This paper presents results from a study estimating agricultural GHG emissions in the form of methane, nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide (including carbon sources and sinks, and the impact of energy consumption/bioenergy production) from Danish agriculture in the years 1990-2010. An analysis of possible measures to reduce the GHG emissions indicated that a 50-70% reduction of agricultural emissions by 2050 relative to 1990 is achievable, including mitigation measures in relation to the handling of manure and fertilisers, optimization of animal feeding, cropping practices, and land use changes with more organic farming, afforestation and energy crops. In addition, the bioenergy production may be increased significantly without reducing the food production, whereby Danish agriculture could achieve a positive energy balance.

[1]  J. Olesen,et al.  Turning climate change information into economic and health impacts , 2007 .

[2]  J. Eriksen,et al.  Emissions of sulfur-containing odorants, ammonia, and methane from pig slurry: effects of dietary methionine and benzoic acid. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Harmonisation of Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Agriculture , 1997 .

[4]  David Chadwick,et al.  Emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane from cattle manure heaps: effect of compaction and covering , 2005 .

[5]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[6]  A. VanderZaag,et al.  Gas Emissions from Straw Covered Liquid Dairy Manure during Summer Storage and Autumn Agitation , 2009 .

[7]  H. Clark,et al.  Accounting for the utilization of a N2O mitigation tool in the IPCC inventory methodology for agricultural soils , 2007, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[8]  Dmitri Chatskikh,et al.  Effects of reduced tillage on net greenhouse gas fluxes from loamy sand soil under winter crops in Denmark , 2008 .

[9]  Philippe Rochette,et al.  No-till only increases N2O emissions in poorly-aerated soils , 2008 .

[10]  Jane M. F. Johnson,et al.  Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[11]  S. Larsen,et al.  Effects of policy measures implemented in Denmark on nitrogen pollution of the aquatic environment , 2008 .

[12]  J. Olesen,et al.  Region‐specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones , 2009 .

[13]  P. Ambus,et al.  Oxidation of 13C-labeled methane in surface crusts of pig- and cattle slurry , 2005, Isotopes in environmental and health studies.

[14]  J. Galloway,et al.  Reduced nitrogen in ecology and the environment. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[15]  K. Finster,et al.  Observations on microbial activity in acidified pig slurry , 2009 .

[16]  Keryn I. Paul,et al.  Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC) , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffrey D Wolt.  A meta-evaluation of nitrapyrin agronomic and environmental effectiveness with emphasis on corn production in the Midwestern USA , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[18]  Søren Husted,et al.  Seasonal variation in methane emission from stored slurry and solid manures , 1994 .

[19]  J. Porter,et al.  A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming , 2001 .

[20]  Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe,et al.  Global Development of Organic Agriculture: Challenges and Prospects , 2006 .

[21]  T. Dalgaard,et al.  Trend reversal of nitrate in Danish groundwater--a reflection of agricultural practices and nitrogen surpluses since 1950. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  N. Halberg,et al.  Can Organic Farming Help to Reduce National Energy Consumption and Emissions of Greenhouse Gasses in Denmark , 2002 .

[23]  T. Dalgaard,et al.  Biomass energy in organic farming¿the potential role of short rotation coppice , 2005 .

[24]  S. O. Petersen,et al.  Methane oxidation in slurry storage surface crusts. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  W. M. Post,et al.  Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential , 2000 .

[26]  A. VanderZaag,et al.  Permeable Synthetic Covers for Controlling Emissions from Liquid Dairy Manure , 2010 .

[27]  N. Scott,et al.  Monitoring land-use change effects on soil carbon in New Zealand: quantifying baseline soil carbon stocks. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[28]  D. J. Hatch,et al.  Controlling nitrogen flows and losses , 2004 .

[29]  Sven G. Sommer,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emission from Stored Livestock Slurry , 2000 .

[30]  A. Grelle,et al.  Large carbon-sink potential by Kyoto forests in Sweden—a case study on willow plantations , 2007 .

[31]  C. Perrings.  Economy and Environment , 1987 .

[32]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Looking at Biofuels and Bioenergy , 2006, Science.

[33]  Blas Mola-Yudego,et al.  Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden , 2008 .

[34]  Manfred Trimborn,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry , 2006 .

[35]  T. Dalgaard,et al.  Developments In The Nitrogen Surplus And The Fossil Energy Use InDanish Agriculture During The 20th Century , 2003 .

[36]  Barbara Amon,et al.  Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment , 2006 .

[37]  N. Halberg,et al.  Expected Crop Yield Loss When Converting to Organic Dairy Farming in Denmark , 1997 .

[38]  R. Brunsch,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from covered slurry compared with uncovered during storage , 2006 .

[39]  E. Hartung,et al.  Influence of season, ventilation strategy, and slurry removal on methane emissions from pig houses , 2006 .

[40]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. , 2006 .

[41]  S. Husted,et al.  The chemical buffer system in raw and digested animal slurry , 1995, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[42]  Sven G. Sommer,et al.  Nitrogen and organic matter losses during storage of cattle and pig manure , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[43]  S. O. Petersen,et al.  Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[44]  N. Hutchings,et al.  Emissions of gaseous nitrogen species from manure management: a new approach. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[45]  S. G. Sommer,et al.  A new model for calculating the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions through anaerobic co-digestion of manure and organic waste. , 2002 .

[46]  K. Henriksen,et al.  Observations of production and emission of greenhouse gases and ammonia during storage of solids separated from pig slurry: Effects of covering , 2006 .

[47]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an advanced bioethanol technology in the perspective of constrained biomass availability. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.