Gypsum scaling and cleaning in forward osmosis: measurements and mechanisms.

This study investigates gypsum scaling and cleaning behavior in forward osmosis (FO). The results show that gypsum scaling in FO is almost fully reversible, with more than 96% recovery of permeate water flux following a water rinse without addition of chemical cleaning reagents. Parallel comparisons of fouling and cleaning were made between FO (without hydraulic pressure) and RO (under high hydraulic pressure) modes. The shape of the water flux decline curves during gypsum scaling is similar in the two modes, but the flux recovery in FO mode is higher than that in RO mode by about 10%. This behavior suggests that operating in FO mode may reduce the need for chemical cleaning. The role of membrane materials in controlling gypsum scaling and cleaning was investigated using cellulose acetate (CA) and polyamide (PA) membranes. Gypsum scaling of PA membranes causes more severe flux decline and is harder to clean than that of CA membranes. AFM force measurements were performed between a gypsum particle probe and the membrane surfaces to elucidate gypsum scaling mechanisms. Analysis of adhesion force data indicates that gypsum scaling of the PA membrane is dominated by heterogeneous/surface crystallization, while gypsum scaling of the CA membrane is dominated by bulk crystallization and subsequent particle deposition.This finding implies that membrane surface modification and new material development can be an effective strategy to mitigate membrane scaling.

[1]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[2]  R. Haseneder,et al.  Mine water treatment by membrane filtration processes - Experimental investigations on applicability , 2009 .

[3]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[4]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation , 2009 .

[5]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Effects of feed water temperature on inorganic fouling of brackish water RO membranes. , 2009 .

[6]  A. Hamou,et al.  Performance evaluation of BWRO desalination plant - a case study. , 2009 .

[7]  Helmut Cölfen,et al.  Stable Prenucleation Calcium Carbonate Clusters , 2008, Science.

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[9]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[10]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Kinetics of gypsum crystal growth on a reverse osmosis membrane , 2008 .

[11]  Chihpin Huang,et al.  Characteristics of RO foulants in a brackish water desalination plant , 2008 .

[12]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Reverse osmosis desalting of inland brackish water of high gypsum scaling propensity: kinetics and mitigation of membrane mineral scaling. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  High-recovery reverse osmosis desalination using intermediate chemical demineralization , 2007 .

[14]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[16]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water: Integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO , 2007 .

[17]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[18]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[19]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Ranking of antiscalant performance for gypsum scale suppression in the presence of residual aluminum , 2006 .

[20]  Che-Jen Lin,et al.  Comparison of Fouling Mechanism by CaSO4 and CaHPO4 on Nanofiltration Membranes , 2006 .

[21]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic characterization of gypsum scale formation and control in RO membrane desalination of brackish water , 2006 .

[22]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[23]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater , 2005 .

[24]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space Part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis , 2005 .

[25]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Morphometric characterization of calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) scale on reverse osmosis membranes , 2005 .

[26]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[27]  Krzysztof Wandachowicz,et al.  The nucleation kinetic aspects of gypsum nanofiltration membrane scaling , 2004 .

[28]  M. Turek,et al.  Scaling analysis of nanofiltration systems fed with saturated calcium sulfate solutions in the presence of carbonate ions , 2003 .

[29]  Yann A. Le Gouellec,et al.  Control of Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum) Scale in Nanofiltration of Saline Agricultural Drainage Water , 2002 .

[30]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Calcium sulfate (gypsum) scaling in nanofiltration of agricultural drainage water , 2002 .

[31]  Sangho Lee,et al.  EFFECT OF OPERATING CONDITIONS ON CaSO4 SCALE FORMATION MECHANISM IN NANOFILTRATION FOR WATER SOFTENING , 2000 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[33]  J O S H U,et al.  Removal of Natural Steroid Hormones from Wastewater Using Membrane Contactor Processes † , 2022 .