Whither the Developmental State? Explaining Singapore's continued Developmentalism

Abstract This paper examines why the Singapore developmental state, unlike the other East Asian developmental states, has shown no signs of devolving but instead appears to be strengthening its position within society by embarking upon several ‘post-industrial’ economic programmes. By utilising a class relations perspective, the paper argues that the resilience of the Singapore developmental state results from the continued weakness of the domestic capitalist class as well as from the state's collaboration with transnational capital and government-linked corporations. At the same time the working class has continuously been ‘incorporated’ by the state. To illustrate these processes, the paper examines Singapore's Biomedical Sciences Initiative, and the Work Restructuring Scheme, which have reinforced the supremacy of the Singapore developmental state, particularly in the economic sphere. The paper concludes that developmental states need not necessarily devolve, if they can continue to provide economic growth as well as to carefully ‘manage’ class relations in society.

[1]  G. Rodan The Political Economy of Singapore's Industrialization: National State and International Capital , 1989 .

[2]  C. Dent Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan , 2003 .

[3]  E. Dasilva,et al.  Biotechnology and the developing world , 2002 .

[4]  A. Walter From developmental to regulatory state? Japan's new financial regulatory system , 2006 .

[5]  H. Greve,et al.  From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2001 .

[6]  Alexius A. Pereira Biotechnology foreign direct investment in Singapore , 2008 .

[7]  Wealth and Freedom , 1998 .

[8]  Vivek Chibber Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmental State1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  M. Thompson Late industrialisers, late democratisers: Developmental states in the Asia-Pacific , 1996 .

[10]  Lai Si Tsui-Auch Bureaucratic Rationality and Nodal Agency in a Developmental State , 2004 .

[11]  Yun-Tae Kim,et al.  Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state , 1999 .

[12]  Ian Pownall,et al.  An international political economic view of the biotechnology industry , 2000 .

[13]  Alice H. Amsden,et al.  Asia's next giant , 1989 .

[14]  D. Bell The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society , 1973 .

[15]  Judith Cherry,et al.  ‘Big Deal’ or big disappointment? The continuing evolution of the South Korean developmental state , 2005 .

[16]  A. Amsden Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization , 1991 .

[17]  C. Leggett Corporatist trade unionism in Singapore , 1993 .

[18]  L. Low The Singapore developmental state in the new economy and polity , 2001 .

[19]  Ismael Plascencia López The Transnational Capitalist Class , 2002 .

[20]  S. Frenkel,et al.  Organized labor in the Asia-Pacific region : a comparative study of trade unionism in nine countries , 1996 .

[21]  G. Rodan The political economy of Singapore's industrialisation: State policy and international capital investment , 1986 .

[22]  Alexius A. Pereira State Collaboration with Transnational Corporations: The Case of Singapore's Industrial Programmes (1965–1999) , 2000 .