ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains

With the ability to observe the activity from large numbers of neurons simultaneously using modern recording technologies, the chance to identify sub-networks involved in coordinated processing increases. Sequences of synchronous spike events (SSEs) constitute one type of such coordinated spiking that propagates activity in a temporally precise manner. The synfire chain was proposed as one potential model for such network processing. Previous work introduced a method for visualization of SSEs in massively parallel spike trains, based on an intersection matrix that contains in each entry the degree of overlap of active neurons in two corresponding time bins. Repeated SSEs are reflected in the matrix as diagonal structures of high overlap values. The method as such, however, leaves the task of identifying these diagonal structures to visual inspection rather than to a quantitative analysis. Here we present ASSET (Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous EvenTs), an improved, fully automated method which determines diagonal structures in the intersection matrix by a robust mathematical procedure. The method consists of a sequence of steps that i) assess which entries in the matrix potentially belong to a diagonal structure, ii) cluster these entries into individual diagonal structures and iii) determine the neurons composing the associated SSEs. We employ parallel point processes generated by stochastic simulations as test data to demonstrate the performance of the method under a wide range of realistic scenarios, including different types of non-stationarity of the spiking activity and different correlation structures. Finally, the ability of the method to discover SSEs is demonstrated on complex data from large network simulations with embedded synfire chains. Thus, ASSET represents an effective and efficient tool to analyze massively parallel spike data for temporal sequences of synchronous activity.

[1]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Higher-order correlations in non-stationary parallel spike trains : statistical modeling and inference , 2022 .

[2]  Shigeru Shinomoto,et al.  Kernel bandwidth optimization in spike rate estimation , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  Moritz Helias,et al.  Echoes in correlated neural systems , 2012, 1207.0298.

[4]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Replay and Time Compression of Recurring Spike Sequences in the Hippocampus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Markus Diesmann,et al.  Practically Trivial Parallel Data Processing in a Neuroscience Laboratory , 2010 .

[6]  William R. Softky,et al.  Simple codes versus efficient codes , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Asohan Amarasingham,et al.  Ambiguity and nonidentifiability in the statistical analysis of neural codes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Noise Suppression and Surplus Synchrony by Coincidence Detection , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Is there signal in the noise? , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Ad Aertsen,et al.  Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networks , 1999, Nature.

[11]  T. M. Mayhew,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry. , 1991 .

[12]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of cortical activity: properties and behavioral relevance. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Impact of Higher-Order Correlations on Coincidence Distributions of Massively Parallel Data , 2007, Summer School on Neural Networks.

[14]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Higher-Order Statistics of Input Ensembles and the Response of Simple Model Neurons , 2003, Neural Computation.

[15]  Yoram Ben-Shaul,et al.  Temporally precise cortical firing patterns are associated with distinct action segments. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Yihui Cui,et al.  Distinct coincidence detectors govern the corticostriatal spike timing‐dependent plasticity , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Synchrony Unbound A Critical Evaluation of the Temporal Binding Hypothesis , 1999, Neuron.

[18]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience , 2022 .

[19]  Sungho Hong,et al.  Single Neuron Firing Properties Impact Correlation-Based Population Coding , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Detecting synfire chain activity using massively parallel spike train recording. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Nawrot,et al.  Serial correlation in neural spike trains: experimental evidence, stochastic modeling, and single neuron variability. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Detecting synfire chains in parallel spike data , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Michael N. Shadlen,et al.  Noise, neural codes and cortical organization , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  Eric Shea-Brown,et al.  Correlation and synchrony transfer in integrate-and-fire neurons: basic properties and consequences for coding. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[25]  Prof. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Anatomy of the Cortex , 1991, Studies of Brain Function.

[26]  Shigeru Shinomoto,et al.  A Method for Selecting the Bin Size of a Time Histogram , 2007, Neural Computation.

[27]  M. London,et al.  Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex , 2010, Nature.

[28]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Impact of Spike Train Autostructure on Probability Distribution of Joint Spike Events , 2013, Neural Computation.

[29]  M. Abeles Role of the cortical neuron: integrator or coincidence detector? , 1982, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[30]  E. Bienenstock A model of neocortex , 1995 .

[31]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Can Spike Coordination Be Differentiated from Rate Covariation? , 2008, Neural Computation.

[32]  Stephane A. Roy,et al.  Coincidence Detection or Temporal Integration? What the Neurons in Somatosensory Cortex Are Doing , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Moshe Abeles,et al.  Corticonics: Neural Circuits of Cerebral Cortex , 1991 .

[34]  Jaime de la Rocha,et al.  Supplementary Information for the article ‘ Correlation between neural spike trains increases with firing rate ’ , 2007 .

[35]  Yutaka Sakai,et al.  The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process Does Not Reproduce Spiking Statistics of Neurons in Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, Neural Computation.

[36]  William T Newsome,et al.  Is there a signal in the noise? , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  L. Lecam,et al.  On the Distribution of Sums of Independent Random Variables , 1965 .

[38]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[39]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Data-driven significance estimation for precise spike correlation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Farzad Farkhooi,et al.  Adaptation reduces variability of the neuronal population code. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  Single-trial estimation of neuronal firing rates: From single-neuron spike trains to population activity , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Neuronal spike trains and stochastic point processes. I. The single spike train. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Analysis of Parallel Spike Trains , 2010 .

[44]  James M. Bower,et al.  Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research , 1996 .

[45]  Yuji Ikegaya,et al.  Synfire Chains and Cortical Songs: Temporal Modules of Cortical Activity , 2004, Science.

[46]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Effect of cross-trial nonstationarity on joint-spike events , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[47]  G L Gerstein,et al.  Detecting spatiotemporal firing patterns among simultaneously recorded single neurons. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Polychronization: Computation with Spikes , 2006, Neural Computation.

[49]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Unitary Events in Multiple Single-Neuron Spiking Activity: II. Nonstationary Data , 2002, Neural Computation.

[50]  Vanessa A. Bender,et al.  Two Coincidence Detectors for Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Somatosensory Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Ifije E. Ohiorhenuan,et al.  Sparse coding and high-order correlations in fine-scale cortical networks , 2010, Nature.

[52]  G. Laurent,et al.  Intrinsic and Circuit Properties Favor Coincidence Detection for Decoding Oscillatory Input , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Sonja Grün,et al.  CuBIC: cumulant based inference of higher-order correlations in massively parallel spike trains , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[54]  Mikhail A. Lebedev,et al.  Chronic, Wireless Recordings of Large Scale Brain Activity in Freely Moving Rhesus Monkeys , 2014, Nature Methods.