The Effect of Feature Displacement on the Perception of Well-Known Faces

The effect of feature displacement within two well-known faces (Terry Wogan and Cyril Smith) was examined. Image processing equipment was used to produce stimuli in which the features of an original facial image were displaced to form a number of modified images. This technique was first reported by Haig, in a recognition study in which the effect of feature displacement within unfamiliar faces was investigated. In the present experiment a perceptual judgement task was carried out in which subjects were presented with a number of modified faces and asked to judge how dissimilar these were with respect to an original image. A multidimensional scaling analysis of the comparative judgements of the subjects revealed a two-dimensional solution involving displacement of the eyes and mouth. A clear division between up/down and inward/outward displacement within these features (particularly the eyes) was observed. A similar pattern of results was found for both well-known faces. This result indicates that subjects were responding to changes in the facial configuration produced by the different types of feature displacement (horizontal or vertical), as opposed to movement of the features per se. Finally, the results also indicate that the displacement of inner features (mouth, eyes, nose) was more noticeable than displacement of the outer facial features (eg hairline).

[1]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study , 1966 .

[2]  J. Graef,et al.  THE DETERMINATION OF THE UNDERLYING DIMENSIONALITY OF AN EMPIRICALLY OBTAINED MATRIX OF PROXIMITIES. , 1974, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[5]  N D Haig,et al.  How Faces Differ—A New Comparative Technique , 1985, Perception.

[6]  S. McKelvie,et al.  The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face. , 1976 .

[7]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Recognizing human faces. , 1975, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  Nigel D. Haig,et al.  Investigating Face Recognition with an Image Processing Computer , 1986 .

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[10]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[11]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[12]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[13]  H. Ellis,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE USE OF THE PHOTO-FIT TECHNIQUE FOR RECALLING FACES* , 1975 .

[14]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  The User's Guide to Multidimensional Scaling , 1985 .

[15]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cue Saliency in Faces as Assessed by the ‘Photofit’ Technique , 1977, Perception.

[16]  G. Rhodes.  Memory for lateral asymmetries in well-known faces: Evidence for configural information in memory representations of Faces , 1986, Memory & cognition.