Validation of the da Vinci Surgical Skill Simulator across three surgical disciplines: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE In this paper, we evaluate face, content and construct validity of the da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulator (dVSSS) across 3 surgical disciplines. METHODS In total, 48 participants from urology, gynecology and general surgery participated in the study as novices (0 robotic cases performed), intermediates (1-74) or experts (≥75). Each participant completed 9 tasks (Peg board level 2, match board level 2, needle targeting, ring and rail level 2, dots and needles level 1, suture sponge level 2, energy dissection level 1, ring walk level 3 and tubes). The Mimic Technologies software scored each task from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) using several predetermined metrics. Face and content validity were evaluated by a questionnaire administered after task completion. Wilcoxon test was used to perform pair wise comparisons. RESULTS The expert group comprised of 6 attending surgeons. The intermediate group included 4 attending surgeons, 3 fellows and 5 residents. The novices included 1 attending surgeon, 1 fellow, 13 residents, 13 medical students and 2 research assistants. The median number of robotic cases performed by experts and intermediates were 250 and 9, respectively. The median overall realistic score (face validity) was 8/10. Experts rated the usefulness of the simulator as a training tool for residents (content validity) as 8.5/10. For construct validity, experts outperformed novices in all 9 tasks (p < 0.05). Intermediates outperformed novices in 7 of 9 tasks (p < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the energy dissection and ring walk tasks. Finally, experts scored significantly better than intermediates in only 3 of 9 tasks (matchboard, dots and needles and energy dissection) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the face, content and construct validities of the dVSSS across urology, gynecology and general surgery. Larger sample size and more complex tasks are needed to further differentiate intermediates from experts.

[1]  Thenkurussi Kesavadas,et al.  Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator , 2011, BJU international.

[2]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  T. Kesavadas,et al.  Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. , 2010, Urology.

[4]  A. Moinzadeh,et al.  Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. , 2009, Urology.

[5]  Medical Advisory Secretariat.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. , 2010, Ontario health technology assessment series.

[6]  Hiroyuki Egi,et al.  Impact of laparoscopic experience on the proficiency gain of urologic surgeons in robot-assisted surgery. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[7]  Gerald B Healy,et al.  The college should be instrumental in adapting simulators to education. , 2002, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  Michael A Liss,et al.  Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[9]  Gerald M. Fried,et al.  FLS Assessment of Competency Using Simulated Laparoscopic Tasks , 2008, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[10]  Thomas S. Lendvay,et al.  VR Robotic Surgery: Randomized Blinded Study of the dV-Trainer Robotic Simulator , 2008, MMVR.

[11]  G. Fried,et al.  Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[12]  A. Meraney,et al.  da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. , 2012, Urology.

[13]  I. Gill,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[14]  J. Raman,et al.  Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Operative Technique, Outcomes, and Learning Curve , 2007, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[15]  Troy Reihsen,et al.  Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[16]  C. Lallas,et al.  Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. , 2012, Urology.

[17]  Chandru P Sundaram,et al.  Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. , 2009, Journal of endourology.