Implementing standards for the interoperability among healthcare providers in the public regionalized Healthcare Information System of the Lombardy Region

Information technologies (ITs) have now entered the everyday workflow in a variety of healthcare providers with a certain degree of independence. This independence may be the cause of difficulty in interoperability between information systems and it can be overcome through the implementation and adoption of standards. Here we present the case of the Lombardy Region, in Italy, that has been able, in the last 10 years, to set up the Regional Social and Healthcare Information System, connecting all the healthcare providers within the region, and providing full access to clinical and health-related documents independently from the healthcare organization that generated the document itself. This goal, in a region with almost 10 millions citizens, was achieved through a twofold approach: first, the political and operative push towards the adoption of the Health Level 7 (HL7) standard within single hospitals and, second, providing a technological infrastructure for data sharing based on interoperability specifications recognized at the regional level for messages transmitted from healthcare providers to the central domain. The adoption of such regional interoperability specifications enabled the communication among heterogeneous systems placed in different hospitals in Lombardy. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) integration profiles which refer to HL7 standards are adopted within hospitals for message exchange and for the definition of integration scenarios. The IHE patient administration management (PAM) profile with its different workflows is adopted for patient management, whereas the Scheduled Workflow (SWF), the Laboratory Testing Workflow (LTW), and the Ambulatory Testing Workflow (ATW) are adopted for order management. At present, the system manages 4,700,000 pharmacological e-prescriptions, and 1,700,000 e-prescriptions for laboratory exams per month. It produces, monthly, 490,000 laboratory medical reports, 180,000 radiology medical reports, 180,000 first aid medical reports, and 58,000 discharge summaries. Hence, despite there being still work in progress, the Lombardy Region healthcare system is a fully interoperable social healthcare system connecting patients, healthcare providers, healthcare organizations, and healthcare professionals in a large and heterogeneous territory through the implementation of international health standards.

[1]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  H. Peterson.  History of Medical Informatics: From Punched Cards to Computerized Patient Records: A Personal Journey , 2006, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[3]  Bruce A Beckwith,et al.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[4]  A. A. Whittaker,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital. , 2009, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[5]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Case Report: Community-wide Implementation of Health Information Technology: The Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Experience , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  S. Rivard,et al.  Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[7]  C Nøhr.  Evaluation of electronic health record systems. , 2006, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[8]  Sjef Gevers,et al.  Introduction of a national electronic patient record in The Netherlands: some legal issues. , 2011, European journal of health law.

[9]  John Doucette,et al.  Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Paul C. Tang,et al.  Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[11]  M. Stewart,et al.  The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Family Practice : The Providers ’ Perspective , 2009 .

[12]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: The Clinical Document Architecture and the Continuity of Care Record: A Critical Analysis , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  D Kalra,et al.  Electronic Health Record Standards , 2006, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[14]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Francesco Pinciroli,et al.  Barriers Against Adoption of Electronic Health Record in Italy , 2011 .

[16]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[17]  Mark A. Rothstein,et al.  The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology , 2010, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[18]  Amnon Shabo,et al.  Model Formulation: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Christian Lovis,et al.  White Paper: Patient-centered Applications: Use of Information Technology to Promote Disease Management and Wellness. A White Paper by the AMIA Knowledge in Motion Working Group , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  Asuman Dogac,et al.  Interoperability of Medical Device Information and the Clinical Applications: An HL7 RMIM based on the ISO/IEEE 11073 DIM , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[21]  Andrew Casertano,et al.  Using IHE and HL7 conformance to specify consistent PACS interoperability for a large multi-center enterprise. , 2006, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[22]  T Namli,et al.  Testing Conformance and Interoperability of eHealth Applications , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[23]  C Ohmann,et al.  Future Developments of Medical Informatics from the Viewpoint of Networked Clinical Research , 2009, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[24]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[25]  Bradley N. Doebbeling,et al.  Priorities and Strategies for the Implementation of Integrated Informatics and Communications Technology to Improve Evidence-Based Practice , 2006 .