Sex peptide receptor-regulated polyandry modulates the balance of pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Drosophila

[1]  L. Kruuk,et al.  How to quantify (the response to) sexual selection on traits , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  G. Hannell.  Sensory , 2018, Identifying Special Needs.

[3]  T. Pizzari,et al.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Michiels,et al.  Measuring and interpreting sexual selection metrics: evaluation and guidelines , 2017 .

[5]  F. Ponton,et al.  Interactions between the developmental and adult social environments mediate group dynamics and offspring traits in Drosophila melanogaster , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  L. Spurgin,et al.  Pre‐ and postcopulatory sexual selection favor aggressive, young males in polyandrous groups of red junglefowl , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  R. C. Firman,et al.  Postmating Female Control: 20 Years of Cryptic Female Choice , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sexual conflict over remating interval is modulated by the sex peptide pathway , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  J. Evans,et al.  The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre‐ and post‐mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[10]  M. Tatar,et al.  Reproduction regulates Drosophila nutrient intake through independent effects of egg production and sex peptide: Implications for aging , 2016, Nutrition and healthy aging.

[11]  J. Perry,et al.  Insulin signalling mediates the response to male-induced harm in female Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  J. Perry,et al.  Experimental evolution under hyper-promiscuity in Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[13]  L. Simmons,et al.  Postcopulatory sexual selection when a female mates once , 2016, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Stuart Wigby,et al.  Developmental Environment Effects on Sexual Selection in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Comparing pre- and post-copulatory mate competition using social network analysis in wild crickets , 2016, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[16]  A. Kahn,et al.  A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  T. Pizzari,et al.  Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  R. Dukas,et al.  Aggression, mate guarding and fitness in male fruit flies , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  L. Engqvist,et al.  Male birch catkin bugs vary copula duration to invest more in matings with novel females , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Samuel James Walker,et al.  Postmating Circuitry Modulates Salt Taste Processing to Increase Reproductive Output in Drosophila , 2015, Current Biology.

[21]  J. Evans,et al.  Multivariate selection drives concordant patterns of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a livebearing fish , 2015, Nature Communications.

[22]  J. Perry,et al.  Developmental environment mediates male seminal protein investment in Drosophila melanogaster , 2015, Functional ecology.

[23]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Biz R. Turnell,et al.  High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  M. Wolfner,et al.  Sex peptide receptor is required for the release of stored sperm by mated Drosophila melanogaster females. , 2015, Journal of insect physiology.

[26]  M. Taylor,et al.  Polyandry in nature: a global analysis. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  E. Natoli,et al.  Social Variables Affecting Mate Preferences, Copulation and Reproductive Outcome in a Pack of Free-Ranging Dogs , 2014, PloS one.

[28]  D. Richardson,et al.  The measure and significance of Bateman's principles , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  P. David,et al.  DISENTANGLING PRECOPULATORY AND POSTCOPULATORY SEXUAL SELECTION IN POLYANDROUS SPECIES , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  D. Corach,et al.  Male reproductive strategies in black and gold howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya) , 2014, American journal of primatology.

[31]  H. Løvlie,et al.  Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Improving the reporting of P‐values generated by randomization methods , 2013 .

[33]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  “Disentangling nestedness” disentangled , 2013, Nature.

[34]  J. Krause,et al.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  S. Shuster,et al.  How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  G. Parker,et al.  Polyandry: the history of a revolution , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  L. Simmons,et al.  Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. Mank,et al.  Experimental Evolution of a Novel Sexually Antagonistic Allele , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[39]  H. Løvlie,et al.  No evidence for precopulatory inbreeding avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  D. Richardson,et al.  Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  W. Rice,et al.  Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  L. Partridge,et al.  dFOXO-independent effects of reduced insulin-like signaling in Drosophila , 2011, Aging cell.

[43]  Alan H. Krakauer,et al.  The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[44]  A. Clark,et al.  The Genetic Basis for Male × Female Interactions Underlying Variation in Reproductive Phenotypes of Drosophila , 2010, Genetics.

[45]  B. Dickson,et al.  Sex Peptide Receptor and Neuronal TOR/S6K Signaling Modulate Nutrient Balancing in Drosophila , 2010, Current Biology.

[46]  H. Kokko,et al.  The mismeasurement of sexual selection , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[47]  Y. Hingrat,et al.  Absence of male reproductive skew, along with high frequency of polyandry and conspecific brood parasitism in the lekking Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata , 2010 .

[48]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Extra‐pair fertilizations contribute to selection on secondary male ornamentation in a socially monogamous passerine , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[49]  A. Jones.  On the Opportunity for Sexual Selection, the Bateman Gradient and the Maximum Intensity of Sexual Selection , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  W. Eberhard.  Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Sean F. Hanser,et al.  Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  Barry J. Dickson,et al.  Sensory Neurons in the Drosophila Genital Tract Regulate Female Reproductive Behavior , 2009, Neuron.

[53]  Josef K. Müller,et al.  The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  B. Dickson,et al.  A receptor that mediates the post-mating switch in Drosophila reproductive behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[56]  A. Clark,et al.  Larval rearing environment affects several post-copulatory traits in Drosophila melanogaster , 2007, Biology Letters.

[57]  E. Tuttle,et al.  PROMISCUITY DRIVES SEXUAL SELECTION IN A SOCIALLY MONOGAMOUS BIRD , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  S. Pitnick,et al.  Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy–isogamy continuum , 2006, Nature.

[59]  Joe Hereford,et al.  COMPARING STRENGTHS OF DIRECTIONAL SELECTION: HOW STRONG IS STRONG? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  E. Kravitz,et al.  Gender-selective patterns of aggressive behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  S. Lewis,et al.  Female influence over offspring paternity in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  S. Lewis.  Multiple mating and repeated copulations: effects on male reproductive success in red flour beetles , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  T. Chapman,et al.  Sperm competition , 2004, Current Biology.

[64]  A. Desmond,et al.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex by Charles Darwin , 2004 .

[65]  E. Kubli,et al.  Sex-peptide is the molecular basis of the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  L. Partridge,et al.  The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female post-mating responses analyzed by using RNA interference , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  T. Markow.  PERSPECTIVE: FEMALE REMATING, OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO, AND THE ARENA OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA SPECIES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[68]  T. Birkhead,et al.  Evolution of sex: Postcopulatory sexual selection , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[69]  K. Lindström,et al.  How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: Data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  A. Żarnecki.  Global analysis of eeqq contact interactions and future prospects for high energy physics , 1999, hep-ph/9904334.

[71]  P. Stockley.  Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection , 1999, Heredity.

[72]  H. Duan,et al.  shaven and sparkling are mutations in separate enhancers of the Drosophila Pax2 homolog. , 1998, Development.

[73]  C. Gillott.  Male insect accessory glands: Functions and control of secretory activity , 1996 .

[74]  E. Collias,et al.  Social organization of a red junglefowl, Gallus gallus , population related to evolution theory , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF PAIRING SUCCESS, EXTRA‐PAIR COPULATIONS AND MATE QUALITY ON THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[76]  S. J. Arnold.  Bateman's Principles and the Measurement of Sexual Selection in Plants and Animals , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[77]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Animal Mating Systems: A Synthesis Based on Selection Theory , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[78]  A. Dixson,et al.  Reproductive success in the mandrill, Mandrillus sphinx: correlations of male dominance and mating success with paternity, as determined by DNA fingerprinting , 1993 .

[79]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  Copulation behaviour of the osprey Pandion haliaetus , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[80]  T. Birkhead.  Sperm competition in birds. , 1998, Reviews of reproduction.

[81]  S. Boinski.  Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[82]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[83]  D. Dewsbury,et al.  Ejaculate Cost and Male Choice , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[84]  Donald A. Dewsbury,et al.  Effects of novelty of copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena. , 1981 .

[85]  Bateman Aj.  Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. , 1948 .

[86]  R. Ferguson.  The History of a Revolution , 1902, British medical journal.

[87]  C. Darwin.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[88]  P. Guimarães,et al.  A sexual network approach to sperm competition in a species with alternative mating tactics , 2015 .

[89]  G. Parker,et al.  Sexual Selection: The Logical Imperative , 2015 .

[90]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Personalities and presence of hyperaggressive males influence male mating exclusivity and effective mating in stream water striders , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[91]  M. Reichard,et al.  Strategic sperm allocation and a Coolidge effect in an externally fertilizing species , 2013 .

[92]  L. A. Whittingham,et al.  Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds , 2005 .

[93]  T. Markow.  FEMALE REMATING, OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO, AND THE ARENA OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILASPECIES , 2002 .

[94]  W. Kennington,et al.  A simple method to achieve consistent larval density in bottle cultures. , 2001 .

[95]  T. Markow.  Evolution of Drosophila mating systems , 1996 .

[96]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition in birds : evolutionary causes and consequences , 1992 .

[97]  G. Parker,et al.  SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS , 1970 .

[98]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.