Automated content and quality assessment of full-motion-video for the generation of meta data

Virtually all of the video data (and full-motion-video (FMV)) that is currently collected and stored in support of missions has been corrupted to various extents by image acquisition and compression artifacts. Additionally, video collected by wide-area motion imagery (WAMI) surveillance systems and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and similar sources is often of low quality or in other ways corrupted so that it is not worth storing or analyzing. In order to make progress in the problem of automatic video analysis, the first problem that should be solved is deciding whether the content of the video is even worth analyzing to begin with. We present a work in progress to address three types of scenes which are typically found in real-world data stored in support of Department of Defense (DoD) missions: no or very little motion in the scene, large occlusions in the scene, and fast camera motion. Each of these produce video that is generally not usable to an analyst or automated algorithm for mission support and therefore should be removed or flagged to the user as such. We utilize recent computer vision advances in motion detection and optical flow to automatically assess FMV for the identification and generation of meta-data (or tagging) of video segments which exhibit unwanted scenarios as described above. Results are shown on representative real-world video data.

[1]  Gunnar Farnebäck,et al.  Two-Frame Motion Estimation Based on Polynomial Expansion , 2003, SCIA.

[2]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[4]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Targeting and intelligence electro-optical recognition modeling: a juxtaposition of the probabilities of discrimination and the general image quality equation , 1998 .

[5]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Olivier Verscheure,et al.  Perceptual quality measure using a spatiotemporal model of the human visual system , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining Optical Flow , 1981, Other Conferences.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  A Database and Evaluation Methodology for Optical Flow , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.