Politics in 140 Characters or Less: Campaign Communication, Network Interaction, and Political Participation on Twitter

The methods by which politicians and policy makers communicate with the public are constantly adapting to the ever-changing media environment. As part of this changing landscape, this study considers the case of Twitter. Specifically, the authors conduct a survey of political Twitter users, in order to understand their use of the medium and their political behaviors within it. Results indicate that political Twitter users are more interested in and engaged in politics in general and less trusting of the mainstream media. Moreover, the study investigates the extent to which followers of a campaign may affect its overall influence in the Twitterverse.

[1]  William A. Galston,et al.  Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education , 2001 .

[2]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[3]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[4]  E. Rogers.  New Product Adoption and Diffusion , 1976 .

[5]  A. Brenner.  Twitter Use 2012 , 2012 .

[6]  Jeff Gulati,et al.  Communicating with Constituents in 140 Characters or Less: Twitter and the Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the United States Congress , 2010 .

[7]  I. Ajzen.  Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[8]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks , 2004 .

[9]  N. Yang,et al.  Twitter Adoption in Congress , 2010 .

[10]  Carl J. Case,et al.  Twitter Usage in the Fortune 50: A Marketing Opportunity? , 2011 .

[11]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment , 2009, New Media Soc..

[12]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Learning about Politics from the Mass Media , 1997 .

[13]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. , 1987 .

[14]  Brian S. Krueger.  Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States , 2002 .

[15]  Jeffrey Barlow,et al.  Internet and American Life Project , 2006 .

[16]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[17]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[18]  GibsonRachel,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline? , 2013 .

[19]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008 , 2013, New Media Soc..

[20]  David S. Lassen,et al.  Twitter: The Electoral Connection? , 2011 .

[21]  Rasmus Kleis Nielsen,et al.  Mundane internet tools, mobilizing practices, and the coproduction of citizenship in political campaigns , 2011, New Media Soc..

[22]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter , 2011 .

[23]  Allegra Gonzalez,et al.  Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Aaron S. Veenstra,et al.  Digital Democracy: Reimagining Pathways to Political Participation , 2010 .

[25]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[26]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[27]  Scott Counts,et al.  Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter , 2010, ICWSM.

[28]  A. Larsson.  “Rejected Bits of Program Code”: Why Notions of “Politics 2.0” Remain (Mostly) Unfulfilled , 2013 .

[29]  Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, Part I , 1969 .

[30]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[31]  Ivan B. Dylko.  An Examination of Methodological and Theoretical Problems Arising from the Use of Political Participation Indexes in Political Communication Research , 2010 .

[32]  Rachel L. Ruttana,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2018 .

[33]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[34]  Scott Counts,et al.  Comparing Information Diffusion Structure in Weblogs and Microblogs , 2010, ICWSM.

[35]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[36]  Cameron Tonkinwise,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism , 2014 .

[37]  T. Aalberg,et al.  Measuring Political Knowledge in Telephone and Web Surveys: A Cross-National Comparison , 2011 .

[38]  Nathan Yang,et al.  Twitter in Congress: Outreach vs Transparency , 2010 .

[39]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[41]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[42]  I. Ajzen.  Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[43]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[44]  R. Crutchfield.  Conformity and character. , 1955 .

[45]  J. Berry.  The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy , 2003 .

[46]  Jennifer Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[48]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .