Meeting technological and social challenges – Sustainable design principles for damage tolerant microstructures

For advanced high strength steels for automotive application, the time between materials development and regular use in cars, trucks and similar vehicles is rather short. In contradiction to this, hot rolled plates made of high strength low alloy steels which have been developed many years ago still do not find application fields in structural steelwork although they offer impressive mechanical properties. In this paper we argue that inadequate design rules in civil and mechanical engineering prevent such modern high strength steels from displaying their lightweight potential. A technological approach to the problem presented in this paper is to apply damage mechanics models together with probabilistic safety concepts for derivation of new improved safety factors. However, a major obstacle in this process is that these new safety factors will have to be included in the design standards. The development of such standards contains both institutional and epistemic obstacles to including alternative safety models. Taking standardization in Europe as an example, the standardization committee is characterized by both national interest representation and attempts to stimulate European integration and competitiveness. At the epistemic level, different understandings of what counts as evidence for material safety may challenge and postpone adoption of new calculative models. Institutionalization and epistemology thus contribute to a framework for standardization that needs to be questioned in order for new approaches to be accepted. Such questioning cannot be done on the basis of developing new calculation models alone, but needs a clear social component of building coalitions around the inclusion of new considerations, for example those related to sustainability.

[1]  A. Needleman,et al.  Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar , 1984 .

[2]  A. Needleman Material rate dependence and mesh sensitivity in localization problems , 1988 .

[3]  J. Hancock,et al.  On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states , 1976 .

[4]  Björn Eichler,et al.  Vorhersage duktilen Festigkeitsversagens von Stahlbauteilen mit Hilfe schädigungsmechanischer Methoden , 2009 .

[5]  A. Gurson Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials incorporating void nucleation, growth and interaction , 1988 .

[6]  F. A. McClintock,et al.  A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes , 1968 .

[7]  D. M. Tracey,et al.  On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields , 1969 .

[8]  A G Atkins Fracture mechanics and metalforming; damage mechanics and the local approach of yesterday and today , 1997 .

[9]  A. Atkins Fracture in forming , 1996 .

[10]  T. Wierzbicki,et al.  On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space , 2004 .

[11]  J. W. Hancock,et al.  On the role of strain and stress state in ductile failure , 1983 .

[12]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures , 1985 .

[13]  V. Tvergaard Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions , 1981 .

[14]  A. Gurson Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth: Part I—Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Porous Ductile Media , 1977 .

[15]  A. Needleman,et al.  Mesh effects in the analysis of dynamic ductile crack growth , 1994 .