A new workflow to incorporate prior information in minimum gradient support (MGS) inversion of electrical resistivity and induced polarization data

Abstract The current paradigm for geophysical inversions is to select the simplest solution according to Occam's principle. The implicit assumption usually made is that the parameters of interest have a smooth spatial distribution, which is rarely geologically plausible. An alternative is the Minimum Gradient Support (MGS), a functional that allows to compute a regularized inversion favoring sharp contrasts. However, solutions are highly sensitive to the selection of a variable called the focusing parameter β and the method is not very performant when many structures are present in the subsurface. Thus, we propose a new workflow to apply this functional to real case studies where heterogeneous structures are expected: a smooth solution is first computed and used as a starting model for sharp MGS inversions. Sequentially incorporating additional prior information on resistivity (e.g., from drillings, previous geophysical surveys) is possible and further improves imaging for resistivity and chargeability structures. The new methodology is first tested on a synthetic case and then applied to ERT/IP data collected on a gold deposit. The methodology enables to compute plausible electrical resistivity spatial distributions in accordance with the vast prior geological knowledge, and reveals new insights about the mineralization key characteristics. The choice of β remains challenging and should be automated in future developments.

[1]  Thomas Hermans,et al.  3D electrical resistivity tomography of karstified formations using cross-line measurements , 2017 .

[2]  Andrew Binley,et al.  An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data , 2015 .

[3]  P. Routh,et al.  Incorporating geostatistical constraints in nonlinear inversion problems , 2007 .

[4]  P. Renard,et al.  Geological realism in hydrogeological and geophysical inverse modeling: A review , 2015, 1701.01602.

[5]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Inverse problems with structural prior information , 1999 .

[6]  K. Kubik,et al.  Compact gravity inversion , 1983 .

[7]  Roland Martin,et al.  Imaging artificial salt water infiltration using electrical resistivity tomography constrained by geostatistical data , 2012 .

[8]  T. Dahlin,et al.  Multiple-gradient array measurements for multichannel 2D resistivity imaging , 2006 .

[9]  A. Hördt,et al.  A new sensitivity-controlled focusing regularization scheme for the inversion of induced polarization data based on the minimum gradient support , 2008 .

[10]  E. Gloaguen,et al.  Constrained electrical resistivity tomography Bayesian inversion using inverse Matérn covariance matrix , 2017 .

[11]  Esben Auken,et al.  Generalized focusing of time-lapse changes with applications to direct current and time-domain induced polarization inversions , 2015 .

[12]  Oliver Kuras,et al.  Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method , 2013 .

[13]  Frédéric Nguyen,et al.  A shallow geothermal experiment in a sandy aquifer monitored using electric resistivity tomography , 2012 .

[14]  Myeong-Jong Yi,et al.  Inversion of ERT data with a priori information using variable weighting factors , 2014 .

[15]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[16]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Minimum support nonlinear parametrization in the solution of a 3D magnetotelluric inverse problem , 2004 .

[17]  T. Günther,et al.  Constraining 3-D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization , 2012 .

[18]  Esben Auken,et al.  Sharp spatially constrained inversion with applications to transient electromagnetic data , 2015 .

[19]  Frédéric Nguyen,et al.  Gravimetric water distribution assessment from geoelectrical methods (ERT and EMI) in municipal solid waste landfill. , 2016, Waste management.

[20]  A. Aizebeokhai,et al.  The use of the multiple-gradient array for geoelectrical resistivity and induced polarization imaging. , 2014 .

[21]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[22]  Torleif Dahlin,et al.  Improvement in time-domain induced polarization data quality with multi-electrode systems by separating current and potential cables , 2012 .

[23]  Rita Deiana,et al.  Focused inversion of vertical radar profile (VRP) traveltime data , 2012 .

[24]  Frédéric Nguyen,et al.  Assessing the contribution of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self-potential (SP) methods for a water well drilling program in fractured/karstified limestones , 2011 .

[25]  T. Günther,et al.  Geostatistical regularization operators for geophysical inverse problems on irregular meshes , 2018 .

[26]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Subspace linear inverse method , 1994 .

[27]  Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin,et al.  Applying Compactness Constraints to Differential Traveltime Tomography , 2007 .

[28]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys , 2001 .

[29]  D. Caterina,et al.  A comparison study of different image appraisal tools for electrical resistivity tomography , 2013 .

[30]  D. Caterina,et al.  Case studies of incorporation of prior information in electrical resistivity tomography: comparison of different approaches , 2014 .

[31]  N. Gündoğdu,et al.  Characterization of the bridge pillar foundations using 3d focusing inversion of DC resistivity data , 2020 .

[32]  C.R.E. de Oliveira,et al.  Constrained resistivity inversion using seismic data , 2005 .

[33]  J. Irving,et al.  Facies discrimination with electrical resistivity tomography using a probabilistic methodology : effect of sensitivity and regularization , 2017 .

[34]  James Macnae,et al.  Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition , 2015 .

[35]  Andreas Kemna,et al.  Delineation of subsurface hydrocarbon contamination at a former hydrogenation plant using spectral induced polarization imaging. , 2011, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[36]  Partha S. Routh,et al.  Model reliability for 3D electrical resistivity tomography: Application of the volume of investigation index to a time-lapse monitoring experiment , 2007 .

[37]  Colin Farquharson,et al.  Constructing piecewise-constant models in multidimensional minimum-structure inversions , 2008 .

[38]  E. Haber,et al.  RESINVM3D: A 3D resistivity inversion package , 2007 .

[39]  D. Mao,et al.  Induced polarization response of porous media with metallic particles — Part 4: Detection of metallic and nonmetallic targets in time-domain-induced polarization tomography , 2016 .

[40]  Michel Chouteau,et al.  3D gravity inversion using a model of parameter covariance , 2003 .

[41]  Chongjin Zhao,et al.  A new stabilizing functional to enhance the sharp boundary in potential field regularized inversion , 2016 .

[42]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys , 1999 .

[43]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Geophysical Investigation of the Pb–Zn Deposit of Lontzen–Poppelsberg, Belgium , 2018, Minerals.

[44]  Michael S. Zhdanov,et al.  Focusing geophysical inversion images , 1999 .

[45]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[46]  Frédéric Nguyen,et al.  Data-driven selection of the minimum-gradient support parameter in time-lapse focused electric imaging , 2016 .