Advances in laparoscopic spay techniques for dogs: the past, present and future

Since the early 1990s, minimally invasive surgery, specifically laparoscopy, has been widely adopted as an alternative to laparotomy in human surgery and has become a standard of care for the treatment of many conditions. The advantages of laparoscopy are now obvious for people. Numerous studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic procedures result in shorter hospital stays and improved surgical outcomes when compared with open abdominal surgery. In veterinary medicine, there is a similar paradigm shift from open surgery to minimally invasive surgery, except that the widespread use of the technique has lagged the human field by 10 to 15 years. Over the past decade, the development and implementation of laparoscopy in veterinary surgery has accelerated, particularly for one of the most common procedures performed in veterinary practice, and for which owners are seeking a less invasive option: elective canine ovariectomy.1,2 The first canine laparoscopic sterilisation procedure was reported by Wildt and Lawler in 1985.3 Since then, laparoscopic ovariectomy techniques have been extensively developed and different methods have been described. Laparoscopic ovariectomies are now routinely performed and have become the most popular, if not the most commonly performed, minimally invasive soft tissue procedure in veterinary medicine in several countries.4,5 To date, despite the lack of comparative blinded trials, the advantages of laparoscopy are indisputable.6 Indeed, many reports describe fewer perioperative complications, reduced postoperative pain, less surgical stress and an increase in postoperative activity levels in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy compared with open procedures.7-10 Additional advantages of laparoscopic ovariectomy include excellent visibility of the genitourinary tract, including the ovarian vessels and other viscera. …

[1]  J. Aurich,et al.  Postoperative complications and owner assessment of single portal laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs , 2018, Veterinary Record.

[2]  P. Mayhew,et al.  Evaluation of pet owner preferences for operative sterilization techniques in female dogs within the veterinary community , 2018, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[3]  C. Phypers In Cats and Dogs Does Laparoscopic Ovariectomy Offer Advantages Over Open Ovariectomy for Postoperative Recovery , 2017 .

[4]  G. Damiano,et al.  Laparotomic vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: comparing the two methods. The ovariectomy in the bitch in laparoscopic era. , 2017, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[5]  J. Aurich,et al.  A surgical glove port technique for laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy for pyometra in the bitch. , 2016, Theriogenology.

[6]  F. Sánchez-Margallo,et al.  Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between laparoendoscopic single-site and three-portal access , 2015, Journal of veterinary science.

[7]  P. Kass,et al.  Comparison of the ability of veterinary medical students to perform laparoscopic versus conventional open ovariectomy on live dogs. , 2015, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[8]  E. Haas,et al.  Review of single incision laparoscopic surgery in colorectal surgery. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[9]  E. Monnet,et al.  Comparison of Single Port Access Versus Multiple Port Access Systems in Elective Laparoscopy: 98 Dogs (2005-2014). , 2015, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[10]  R. Boston,et al.  Evaluation of the learning curve for a board-certified veterinary surgeon performing laparoendoscopic single-site ovariectomy in dogs. , 2014, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[11]  J. Y. Lee,et al.  Comparison of Oxidative Stress Status in Dogs Undergoing Laparoscopic and Open Ovariectomy , 2013, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[12]  A. Khalaj,et al.  Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs , 2014, Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal.

[13]  T. Parkinson Progress towards less invasive veterinary surgery , 2012, Veterinary Record.

[14]  V. Viateau,et al.  Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs using a single-port multiple-access device , 2012, Veterinary Record.

[15]  P. Mayhew Developing minimally invasive surgery in companion animals , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[16]  P. Boscan,et al.  Surgical time and severity of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing laparoscopic ovariectomy with one, two, or three instrument cannulas. , 2011, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[17]  Pedro F Escobar,et al.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynaecology: A new frontier in minimally invasive surgery , 2011, Journal of minimal access surgery.

[18]  M. Skalicky,et al.  Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between single portal and two-portal access. , 2009, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[19]  P. Mayhew,et al.  The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. , 2009, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[20]  J. Mcclaran,et al.  Complications and need for conversion to laparotomy in small animals. , 2009, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[21]  A. Bufalari,et al.  Pain Assessment in Animals , 2007, Veterinary Research Communications.

[22]  Ann L. Johnson,et al.  Frequency of use of various procedures, skills, and areas of knowledge among veterinarians in private small animal exclusive or predominant practice and proficiency expected of new veterinary school graduates. , 2004, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[23]  J. Kirpensteijn,et al.  Monopolar versus bipolar electrocoagulation in canine laparoscopic ovariectomy: a nonrandomized, prospective, clinical trial. , 2003, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[24]  N. Nudelmann LA LAPAROSCOPIE CHEZ LES CARNIVORES DOMESTIQUES: ACTES CHIRURGICAUX PAR ABORD UNIQUE , 1996 .

[25]  D. Lawler,et al.  Laparoscopic sterilization of the bitch and queen by uterine horn occlusion. , 1985, American journal of veterinary research.