Taking the dread out of radiation? Consequences of and arguments over the inclusion of radiation from nuclear power production in the category of the natural

[1]  Rosalind Gill,et al.  Burman, E. and Parker, I. (eds) (1993) Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. London: Routledge. , 1993 .

[2]  S. Reicher,et al.  On the nature of nature : experimental studies in the power of rhetoric , 1992 .

[3]  Alexander Wilson,et al.  The culture of nature , 1992 .

[4]  D. Edwards.  Categories Are for Talking , 1991 .

[5]  Andrew Chitty,et al.  Quantification Rhetoric—cancer on Television , 1991 .

[6]  Discourses of Danger and Dangerous Discourses: Patrolling the Borders of Science, Nature and Society , 1991 .

[7]  Michael Billig,et al.  Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking , 1988 .

[8]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Societal risks as seen by a Norwegian public , 1988 .

[9]  Sources of evaluation of nuclear and renewable energy contained in the local press , 1987 .

[10]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[11]  P. Slovic,et al.  A comparative analysis of risk perception in Hungary and the United States , 1986 .

[12]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations , 1985 .

[13]  K. B. Shaw,et al.  The radiation exposure of the UK population : 1984 review , 1984 .

[14]  W. L. Rankin,et al.  Public opinion and nuclear energy , 1983 .

[15]  Gerald Berk,et al.  Public Opposition to Nuclear Energy: Retrospect and Prospect , 1980 .

[16]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power , 1979 .

[17]  Raymond Williams.  Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society , 1976 .