Data Quality Metadata and Decision Making

Data quality metadata (QM) is the set of quality measurements associated with the data. Literature has demonstrated that the provision of QM can improve decision performance. In this paper, we examine how information systems, specifically, decision support systems can be designed to help users make better use of QM, using a two-stage approach. In stage-1, we develop a theoretical model and validate it using experimental settings to understand how QM affects decision performance, particularly, the cognitive overload QM creates. In stage-2, based on data visualization literature, we posit that the cognitive load may be reduced by visualization. We develop a visual interface for visualizing data and associated QM. We investigate whether the visual interface will permit a superior integration of QM when compared with a textual interface, even for complex tasks with less-experience users. The results of our experiment largely supported our theory and hypotheses.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  M. Nyeko GIS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Land Use Resource Planning , 2012 .

[3]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[4]  InduShobha N. Chengalur-Smith,et al.  The Impact of Experience and Time on the Use of Data Quality Information in Decision Making , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Thomas Redman,et al.  Data quality for the information age , 1996 .

[6]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[7]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[8]  Yu Cai,et al.  Supporting data quality management in decision-making , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Adaptive decision behavior: An introduction , 1993 .

[10]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Journey to Data Quality , 2006 .

[11]  P. C. Nutt Types of organizational decision processes. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[12]  Michael F. Morris Kiviat graphs: conventions and "figures of merit" , 1974, PERV.

[13]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making , 2000 .

[14]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[15]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[16]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[17]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[18]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[19]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[21]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[22]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .