Measuring disparate outcomes of content recommendation algorithms with distributional inequality metrics

[1]  Ben Green.  Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness: From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness , 2021, Philosophy & Technology.

[2]  Shira Mitchell,et al.  Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions , 2021, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[3]  Rediet Abebe,et al.  Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making , 2021, FAccT.

[4]  Moritz Hardt,et al.  From Optimizing Engagement to Measuring Value , 2020, FAccT.

[5]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning , 2019, ACM Comput. Surv..

[6]  Ben Green,et al.  Escaping the 'Impossibility of Fairness': From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Yuekai Sun,et al.  Individually Fair Rankings , 2021, ICLR.

[8]  Jack Bandy,et al.  More Accounts, Fewer Links , 2021, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Michael D. Ekstrand,et al.  Comparing Fair Ranking Metrics , 2020, ArXiv.

[10]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  SimClusters: Community-Based Representations for Heterogeneous Recommendations at Twitter , 2020, KDD.

[11]  Zolt'an N'eda,et al.  Gintropy: Gini Index Based Generalization of Entropy , 2020, Entropy.

[12]  Thitithep Sitthiyot,et al.  A simple method for measuring inequality , 2020, Palgrave Communications.

[13]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  An Economic Perspective on Algorithmic Fairness , 2020 .

[14]  Amir Sepehri,et al.  Fairness through Experimentation: Inequality in A/B testing as an approach to responsible design , 2020, ArXiv.

[15]  Catherine Tucker,et al.  Algorithmic Fairness and Economics , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  S. Merz.  Race after technology. Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code , 2020, Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[17]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[18]  Ruha Benjamin.  Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code , 2019, Social Forces.

[19]  Sahin Cem Geyik,et al.  Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Search , 2019, KDD.

[20]  Piotr Sapiezynski,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of User Attentionon Fair Group Representation in Ranked Lists , 2019, WWW.

[21]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual &Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices , 2018, KDD.

[22]  Christo Wilson,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Gender on Rank in Resume Search Engines , 2018, CHI.

[23]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Fairness of Exposure in Rankings , 2018, KDD.

[24]  Safiya Noble,et al.  Algorithms of Oppression , 2018 .

[25]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification , 2018, FAT.

[26]  Seth Neel,et al.  Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness , 2017, ICML.

[27]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm , 2017, CIKM.

[28]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media , 2017, CSCW.

[29]  Julia Stoyanovich,et al.  Measuring Fairness in Ranked Outputs , 2016, SSDBM.

[30]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Attention Inequality in Social Media , 2016, ArXiv.

[31]  S. Chakravarty.  Measuring Income Inequality , 2015 .

[32]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  Fairness through awareness , 2011, ITCS '12.

[33]  Frank A. Farris.  The Gini Index and Measures of Inequality , 2010, Am. Math. Mon..

[34]  K. McCurley,et al.  Income Inequality in the Attention Economy , 2007 .

[35]  A. Shorrocks,et al.  The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures , 1980 .

[36]  P. Allison.  Measures of Inequality , 1978 .

[37]  A. Atkinson.  On the measurement of inequality , 1970 .

[38]  C. Gini.  Variabilita e Mutabilita. , 1913 .

[39]  M. O. Lorenz,et al.  Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth , 1905, Publications of the American Statistical Association.