How Concept Selection Tools Impact the Development of Creative Ideas in Engineering Design Education

[1]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  New evaluation methods for conceptual design selection using computational intelligence techniques , 2013 .

[2]  Elizabeth M. Starkey,et al.  Implementing Creativity Evaluation Tools Into the Concept Selection Process in Engineering Education , 2015 .

[3]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[4]  Shimul Melwani,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[5]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  A Novel Method for Providing Global Assessments of Design Concepts Using Single-Word Adjectives and Semantic Similarity , 2014 .

[6]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[7]  H. Gill Adoption of Design Science by Industry — Why so Slow? , 1990 .

[8]  Kazem Kazerounian,et al.  Barriers to Creativity in Engineering Education: A Study of Instructors and Students Perceptions , 2007 .

[9]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  V. M. Rao Tummala,et al.  An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system , 2001 .

[11]  Christoph Maurer,et al.  Conceptual Design Theory in Education Versus Practice in Industry: A Comparison Between Germany and the United States , 2012 .

[12]  Gregory M. Hallihan,et al.  Confirmation and Cognitive Bias in Design Cognition , 2012 .

[13]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[14]  Douglass J. Wilde USING STUDENT PREFERENCES TO GUIDE DESIGN TEAM COMPOSITION , 1997 .

[15]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. , 2006 .

[16]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  The Role of Personality and Team-based Product Dissection on Fixation Effects , 2013 .

[17]  S. Schulz-Hardt,et al.  Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[19]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization , 2005 .

[20]  J. Dyer Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[21]  José L. Jimeno,et al.  Another potential shortcoming of AHP , 2006 .

[22]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity , 1993 .

[23]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Role of Individual Risk Attitudes on the Selection of Creative Concepts in Engineering Design , 2014 .

[24]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[25]  P. Granhag,et al.  Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: the need for cognitive closure , 2005 .

[26]  Kenneth S. Hurst,et al.  Engineering Design Principles , 1999 .

[27]  Paul R. Drake,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Engineering Education , 1998 .

[28]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Mike W. Martin,et al.  Moral creativity in science and engineering , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[30]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR DECISION MAKING IN ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: SOME CHALLENGES , 1995 .

[31]  Rainer Harms,et al.  Interview: Paul Paulus on Group Creativity , 2013 .

[32]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  Decision Methods for Design: Insights from Psychology , 2012 .

[33]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  Mitigating Design Fixation Effects in Engineering Design Through Product Dissection Activities , 2014 .

[34]  J. Valacich,et al.  Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. , 1993 .

[35]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Choosing creativity: the role of individual risk and ambiguity aversion on creative concept selection in engineering design , 2016, Research in Engineering Design.

[36]  V. Belton,et al.  The legitimacy of rank reversal—A comment , 1985 .

[37]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. , 2010, British journal of psychology.

[38]  J. Korpela,et al.  Group decision support for analysing logistics development projects , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[39]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis , 2011 .

[40]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  An Experimental Study of Group Idea Generation Techniques: Understanding the Roles of Idea Representation and Viewing Methods , 2011 .

[41]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Which One Should I Pick? Concept Selection in Engineering Design Industry , 2015 .

[42]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[43]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[45]  S. Parnes,et al.  Effects of "brainstorming" instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. , 1959 .

[46]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance , 1999 .

[47]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  The preference effect in design concept evaluation , 2014 .

[48]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  Creativity in design teams: the influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection , 2016 .

[49]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses , 2014 .

[50]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Effects of Gender and Idea Goodness on Ownership Bias in Engineering Design Education , 2016 .

[51]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[52]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  My Idea Is Best! Ownership Bias and its Influence on Engineering Concept Selection , 2015 .

[53]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[54]  Gregory M. Mocko,et al.  Factors That Effect Motivation and Performance on Innovative Design Projects , 2013 .

[55]  Rozann Whitaker Criticisms of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Why they often make no sense , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[56]  R. Mayer Handbook of Creativity: Fifty Years of Creativity Research , 1998 .

[57]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[58]  Madara Ogot,et al.  Engineering Design: A Practical Guide , 2004 .

[59]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  But Is It Creative? Delineating the Impact of Expertise and Concept Ratings on Creative Concept Selection , 2016 .

[60]  Matti Perttula,et al.  Utilization of Concept Selection Methods: A Survey of Finnish Industry , 2005 .

[61]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  How engineering teams select design concepts: A view through the lens of creativity , 2015 .

[62]  Elizabeth M. Starkey,et al.  Abandoning creativity: The evolution of creative ideas in engineering design course projects , 2016 .

[63]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  How Do I Choose? The Influence of Concept Selection Methods on Student Team Decision-Making , 2016 .

[64]  M. Runco,et al.  The Psychoeconomic View of Creative Work in Groups and Organizations , 1995 .

[65]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[66]  Maya Daneva,et al.  Supporting the Dynamic Reprioritization of Requirements in Agile Development of Software Products , 2008, 2008 Second International Workshop on Software Product Management.

[67]  Charles E. Naquin,et al.  The team halo effect: why teams are not blamed for their failures. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[68]  Nanua Singh,et al.  Creativity and innovation in durable product development , 1998 .

[69]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING RISK IN INNOVATIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1997 .

[70]  Roger B. Stake,et al.  A Framework for Evaluating Commonality , 2001 .