A Proximity-Contingent Stereoscopic Depth Aftereffect: Evidence for Adaptation to Disparity Gradients

Prolonged inspection of a surface slanted in the third dimension of visual space typically results in a negative aftereffect such that, after adaptation, a surface in the fronto-parallel plane will appear slanted in the opposite direction. Binocular disparity is not necessary to generate such effects, since they can be obtained monocularly, presumably via adaptation to texture gradient. Six experiments demonstrated durable stereoscopic depth aftereffects in the absence of a texture gradient—by using discrete disparate objects rather than slanted surfaces— and demonstrated that adaptation was to the interobject disparity gradient rather than to the relative disparity of the objects per se. The disparity required to null the obtained aftereffects was inversely proportional to the horizontal separation of elements, for a constant disparity, and directly proportional to the separation of subsequently presented probes. When elements differed in depth (disparity), but were not laterally separated, nulling disparity was significant but invariant with changes in the horizontal separation of probe elements. In that case, adaptation was (i) either to the disparity gradient generated by the vertical separation of probe elements (of which the relative disparity component was tapped); or (ii) to relative disparity per se.

[1]  Ray Over,et al.  Stereospatial masking and aftereffect with normal and transformed random-dot patterns , 1974 .

[2]  B. Rogers,et al.  Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. , 1983, Science.

[3]  B. Julesz,et al.  Modifications of the Classical Notion of Panum's Fusional Area , 1980, Perception.

[4]  M. Fahle,et al.  Perceived Depth Scales with Disparity Gradient , 1991, Perception.

[5]  J. Gibson,et al.  The Negative After-Effect of the Perception of a Surface Slanted in the Third Dimension , 1959 .

[6]  William Lovegrove,et al.  Absence of binocular interaction between spatial and color attributes of visual stimuli , 1973 .

[7]  B Gillam,et al.  Postfusional latency in stereoscopic slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth Aftereffect Produced without Monocular Cues , 1971, Science.

[9]  P. Wenderoth A Visual Spatial Aftereffect of Surface Slant , 1970 .

[10]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[11]  Peter J. Burt,et al.  The Disparity Gradient Limit for Binocular Fusion: An Answer to J D Krol and W A Van de Grind , 1982 .

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  D E Mitchell,et al.  Stereoscopic aftereffects: evidence for disparity-specific neurones in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[14]  W. Kohler,et al.  Figural after-effects in the third dimensions of visual space. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  J. Krol,et al.  Rehabilitation of a Classical Notion of Panum's Fusional Area , 1982, Perception.

[16]  S. A. Lloyd,et al.  The Role of Disparity Gradient in Stereo Vision , 1985, Perception.

[17]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  N Long,et al.  Stereoscopic depth aftereffects with random-dot patterns. , 1973, Vision research.