A fuzzy multi-criteria decision support for antivirus selection

In last few decades the software industry has been developed drastically. The Organizations are fully dependent on the computer based information systems. Due to the advancement in the technology we need to secure our data from the intruders and viruses. Today the Antivirus is the necessity for the computers. The various types of antivirus softwares are available in the market according to the need of the Information Systems. An Antivirus is a critical for excellence in protection, security and performance. Antivirus selection involves identifying the right one on behalf of multiple attributes including cost, delivery time, and quality. Thus, antivirus selection inherently is a multi-criteria decision problem (MCD) and can be quite complex. To address the uncertainty in antivirus selection with multiple attributes, a number of researchers have employed fuzzy models. In order to choose the best antivirus that will satisfy our parameters we used the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Antivirus were rated on four attributes, protection, performance, cost, usability and support. Extent analysis was employed for defuzzification.

[1]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments , 1973 .

[2]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review , 2015, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[4]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[5]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step‐wise weight assessment ratio analysis (Swara) , 2010 .

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[8]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  New KEMIRA Method for Determining Criteria Priority and Weights in Solving MCDM Problem , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[9]  K R MacCrimmon,et al.  Decisionmaking among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach , 1968 .

[10]  Abbas Mardani,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 , 2015 .

[11]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Application of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques and approaches to evaluating of service quality: a systematic review of the literature , 2015 .

[12]  K. Atanassov New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[13]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications - Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Romualdas Ginevicius,et al.  A New Determining Method for the Criteria Weights in multicriteria Evaluation , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[15]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Relative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: a conjoint study , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..